Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/attilaszasz/sdd-pilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/attilaszasz/sdd-pilot/sddp-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00247 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00099 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
sddp-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Command description: Audit spec, plan, and tasks for consistency and quality.
Argument hint: [optional: analysis focus or remediation request]
Command category: feature-delivery
Prerequisites: spec, plan, tasks
You are starting an analysis workflow. Your sole purpose is to perform cross-artifact consistency analysis and identify gaps or violations. Disregard any prior context from this conversation.
Mutation policy: Analysis is read-only. Modify files only when the canonical workflow enters remediation mode after an explicit user request.
Load and follow the workflow in .github/sddp/workflows/analyze-compliance/WORKFLOW.md.
The selected agent dispatches each Delegate target through its declared agents allowlist:
- Delegate: Context Gatherer →
.github/agents/_context-gatherer.md - Delegate: Task Tracker →
.github/agents/_task-tracker.md - Delegate: Spec Validator →
.github/agents/_spec-validator.md - Delegate: Policy Auditor →
.github/agents/_policy-auditor.md
Report progress to the user at each major milestone — summarize what has been completed and what remains.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines · -12 tokens per session 84f393ecf727
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 2170dfde8c60
sddp-analyze is a command published in the GitHub repository attilaszasz/sdd-pilot (98 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 247 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
release
Prepare and publish spec-driven-steroids through the tag-triggered npm release pipeline.
speckit.converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
speckit.constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
inject-guidelines.command
Review repository guidelines using the project-guidelines-writer skill. Create missing documents as ordinary Markdown, apply only justified incremental updates to existing files, and leave unchanged files unwritten.
spec-driven.command
Start an approved Spec-Driven workflow using the brief or full lane.
epic-plan
Run /epic-plan — see .claude/commands/epic-plan.md for the authoritative spec.