Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/authzed/authzed-marketplace/migrate-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/authzed/authzed-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/authzed/authzed-marketplace/migrate-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/authzed/authzed-marketplace/migrate-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/authzed/authzed-marketplace/migrate-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.20971 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.10486 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.04194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.02097 |
Grade A, and why
migrate-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Migrate Verify
This command implements cutover-strategies.md step 4, "Dual-write, shadow-read": it emits a
working differential harness into the customer's own project, in their language, wired to both
the source system and SpiceDB, so that a real cutover can run both systems side by side and know
whether they agree before a single user's access starts depending on SpiceDB alone.
The distinction that governs everything below: tools/migration-harness/ is ours -- it
proves the converter is correct against a corpus this project controls, is never shipped, and
has no role here. What this command emits is the customer's -- it proves their migration is
correct against traffic this project will never see, and it ships into their repository with no
runtime dependency on this one. differential-harness.md's own framing states this exactly:
"What ships is a specification, not a service this project operates... built once, by
/spicedb-dev:migrate-verify, and then it is theirs to run, extend, and eventually retire." Do
not reference tools/migration-harness/'s paths anywhere in what this command emits or tells the
user, and do not let a reviewer of this command conflate the two -- they solve different problems
for different owners.
This command's own risk shape is different from every phase before it. Phases 1, 2, and 5
produce artifacts a human reviews before anything downstream depends on them. Phase 3 writes to a
live system, but only once, behind an explicit confirmation. What this command emits runs
continuously, unattended, beside live production traffic, for as long as the shadow-read
window lasts. Its failure modes must never surface as a decision that affects a real user --
differential-harness.md's "safety property" is not a nice-to-have here, it is the entire reason
this command is safe to ship at all -- and its comparisons must never manufacture a disagreement
that isn't real. Two known ways a harness does that anyway, both demonstrated live in the pack's
own references, are why every step below cites rather than re-derives its rules:
- Name translation.
source-adapter.md's "What getting it wrong looks like, live" section shows one field of one lookup -- reading a split relation's.relationinstead of its.permission-- flip a record fromAGREEto a candidateDISAGREEon a migration that converted correctly. A harness that reports this as a real regression sends a correctly converted resource type back for rework and repeats the false alarm on every future run. - Consistency staleness.
differential-harness.md's "Diff" section measured aminimize_latencycheck fired immediately after the write that made it true returning the stale (pre-write) answer in 95.3% of trials at a ~360µs write-to-check gap, collapsing to 0% by 5ms onserve-testing's own hardcoded quantization window -- and states plainly that a real deployment's window (--datastore-revision-quantization-interval, 5 seconds by default) can be far larger. A harness that reports every stale-window disagreement as a genuine defect drowns real ones in noise from the first hour it runs.
Both are handled structurally below, not merely documented: this harness's check/lookup path
never reads a .relation field, and every candidate disagreement is reconciled against a captured
zedtoken before it is ever finalized.
This is not one of the six pipeline phases (SKILL.md's phase table, phases 0-5). It is the
tool cutover-strategies.md names for its own step 4, "Dual-write, shadow-read": that file's own
"Where this sits in the pipeline" table lists step 4 as automated, and its step-4 section points
here for the harness's mechanics rather than restating them. Do not add a Phase status row for
it (step 8, below) -- it sits alongside the six phases, not inside them.
Outputs, written under [project-dir] (placement resolved in step 3) unless a step below says
otherwise:
migration/verify/source_adapter.<ext>-- the pack'sobserve()/ask()entry points, in the project's own language.migration/verify/harness.<ext>-- theQuestion/Outcome/DifferentialRecordrecord shape,Diff, reconciliation, and the safety wrapper.migration/verify/dual_run.<ext>-- the out-of-band dispatcher and sampling configuration.migration/verify/snapshot_to_assertions.<ext>-- turns a batch of confirmed agreements into validation YAML.migration-map.json-- updated only if step 3 resolves a call-site language the plan had not recorded, appended todecisions.additional(step 8); this command never writes aphase_statusentry -- see step 8 for why.migration-plan.md-- updated in place with a coverage record under Deferred / manual, and its rendered sections regenerated frommigration-map.jsonwhen (and only when) that file changed this run (step 8; this command does not add a Phase status row -- see step 8 for why).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 1,112 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 9716611b6b34
migrate-verify is a command published in the GitHub repository authzed/authzed-marketplace (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 20,971 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.