Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/avsm/ocaml-claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/avsm/ocaml-claude-marketplace/add-rfc)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/avsm/ocaml-claude-marketplace/add-rfc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/avsm/ocaml-claude-marketplace/add-rfc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/avsm/ocaml-claude-marketplace/add-rfc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/avsm/ocaml-claude-marketplace/add-rfc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00827 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
add-rfc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Add RFC
This command fetches an IETF RFC specification and integrates it into the project.
Arguments
RFC number: $ARGUMENTS (required, e.g., "6265" for HTTP cookies)
Process
1. Fetch the RFC
Fetch from IETF in plain text format:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc<NUMBER>.txt
Important: Always use .txt extension, not .html.
2. Save to spec/ Directory
Create spec/ directory if it doesn't exist and save:
spec/rfc<NUMBER>.txt
3. Parse RFC Structure
Extract key information:
- RFC title and abstract
- Table of contents (sections)
- Key terminology definitions
- Related RFCs (obsoletes, updates, references)
4. Generate OCamldoc Citation Templates
Provide ready-to-use citations for:
Module-level:
(** RFC <NUMBER> <Title>.
This module implements <description> as specified in
{{:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc<NUMBER>}RFC <NUMBER>}.
{2 References}
{ul
{- {{:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc<NUMBER>}RFC <NUMBER>} - <Title>}} *)
Section-specific:
(** Implements {{:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc<NUMBER>#section-N}RFC <NUMBER> Section N}. *)
5. Suggest Integration Points
Search the codebase for:
- Functions that might implement RFC sections
- Existing RFC references that could be improved
- Types that represent RFC concepts
Output
Provide:
- Confirmation of RFC download
- Summary of RFC contents (title, sections)
- OCamldoc citation templates, worded under the
doc-styleskill - Suggestions for where to add citations in existing code
Example Usage
/add-rfc 6265
/add-rfc 3492
Success Output
Fetched RFC 6265: HTTP State Management Mechanism
Saved to: spec/rfc6265.txt
RFC Summary:
Title: HTTP State Management Mechanism
Obsoletes: RFC 2965
Sections:
1. Introduction
2. Conventions
3. Overview
4. Server Requirements
5. User Agent Requirements
6. Implementation Considerations
7. Privacy Considerations
8. Security Considerations
OCamldoc Templates:
Module-level:
(** RFC 6265 HTTP State Management Mechanism.
This module implements HTTP cookie handling as specified in
{{:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6265}RFC 6265}. *)
Section references:
- {{:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6265#section-4}RFC 6265 Section 4} - Server Requirements
- {{:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6265#section-5}RFC 6265 Section 5} - User Agent Requirements
- {{:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6265#section-5.2}RFC 6265 Section 5.2} - The Set-Cookie Header
Related RFCs you might also need:
- RFC 2616 - HTTP/1.1 (obsoleted by RFC 7230-7235)
- RFC 7230 - HTTP/1.1 Message Syntax and Routing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed c7e7c7f7ccc8
- 11d ago First seen · 121 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A bcb4fadc44a2
add-rfc is a command published in the GitHub repository avsm/ocaml-claude-marketplace (35 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed ISC. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 827 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
fastapi
FastAPI application design and implementation conventions. Use this skill when building, updating, or reviewing FastAPI services, routers, dependencies, request/response schemas, streaming endpoints, or API tests. Trigger on FastAPI-specific work such as path operation design, dependency injection, response models…
azure-graph-dotnet:deploy-azure
Deploy a C# Azure Functions or Container Job project to Azure — provision infrastructure with Bicep, push image to ACR, assign Managed Identity Graph permissions, and generate or update GitHub Actions or Azure DevOps CI/CD pipelines.
go-review
Go code review for idiomatic patterns.
kotlin-review
Comprehensive Kotlin code review for idiomatic patterns, null safety, coroutine safety, and security. Invokes the kotlin-reviewer agent.
savant-python
Python performance optimization with Python Developer agent.
cli-enhance
Add features to existing CLI applications like colors, progress bars, shell completions, and better error messages.