Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to awattar/claude-code-best-practices. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/awattar/claude-code-best-practices/main/.claude/commands/reviewpr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/awattar/claude-code-best-practicesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/awattar/claude-code-best-practices/reviewpr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/awattar/claude-code-best-practices/reviewpr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/awattar/claude-code-best-practices/reviewpr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/awattar/claude-code-best-practices/reviewpr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/awattar/claude-code-best-practices/reviewpr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00851 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00340 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
reviewpr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Claude Code User Command: Reviewpr
This command helps you thoroughly review GitHub pull requests specified in $ARGUMENTS.
Usage
To review a pull request, just type:
/reviewpr <pr-number>
What This Command Does
- Fetches PR details and diff for $ARGUMENTS using GitHub CLI (
gh). - Checks CI/CD status and checks out the PR locally.
- Reviews code quality, observability, and tests the changes.
- Documents findings in a scratchpad and submits review via GitHub CLI (
gh). - Monitors for author responses and re-reviews as needed.
Agents Used
This command leverages specialized agents for comprehensive pull request review:
- general-code-quality-debugger - Essential for systematic code review and quality assessment
- general-technical-project-lead - For security assessments and architectural review
- general-qa - For testing validation and edge case identification
- general-solution-architect - For reviewing architectural decisions and patterns
Each agent contributes specialized expertise to ensure thorough project analysis and high-quality documentation generation.
Follow these steps:
General
Follow GitHub flow and code review best practices - https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests
Before starting:
- Identify the project's test framework and browser automation tools (e.g., puppeteer, playwright, selenium) for testing UI change via MCP. Check project documentation or ask if unclear.
- Remember to use the GitHub CLI (
gh) for all PR-related tasks.
Analyze
Gather context and understand the PR:
- Use
gh pr viewto get the PR details and description. - Use
gh pr diffto review the changes in detail. - Check the PR against the original issue requirements:
- Use
gh pr view --json body,title,numberto get linked issues. - Verify all acceptance criteria are met.
- Use
- Search scratchpads for any design decisions or context related to this PR.
- Use
gh pr checksto verify CI/CD status.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 1dc88bde6e51
reviewpr is a command published in the GitHub repository awattar/claude-code-best-practices (262 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 851 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
speckit.spex.submit
Push and create PR for team review, with optional watch mode for CI monitoring.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
factory
Linha de montagem multi-agente (Software Factory) — spec-writer → builder em worktree isolado → 4 revisores paralelos (Security, Code, UI, UX) → approver com gate de risco e dashboard visual.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
release-tag
Create and push a version tag after a release PR has been merged.