ABCA is a sample AWS platform that lets coding agents take repository tasks, work in isolated cloud environments, run checks, and open pull requests without continuous human interaction. It is for teams running asynchronous, repository-focused software work through sources such as Slack, issue trackers, command-line tools, or webhooks. The catalogue add-ons support operating and navigating this background-agent platform.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents/review_prs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents/review_prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents/review_prs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents/review_prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents/review_prs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03393 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01357 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00679 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00339 |
Grade A, and why
review_prs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed MIT-0
The repository is licensed MIT-0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 204 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c86ea1cf671c
review_prs is a command published in the GitHub repository aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents (162 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT-0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,393 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from ruvnet/ruflo, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
factory-ticket
Implement exactly one already-claimed Linear ticket in the current worktree.
review-pr
Command "review-pr" from saski/arnesto, covering review pr, what this command does, workflow steps, phase 0: initialize review and phase 1: analysis & summary.
review-code
Call getworkflowcommandguidance(kind="design-plan", focus="Architecture focus: inspect saved scripts against their current step objectives, input/output contracts, and relevant retained behavior. Propose improvements without applying them.
audit
Audit a window of recent commits for real defects, confirm each finding before fixing, verify every surface a fix touches, then report confirmed/dismissed/no-op with evidence. Enforces Law 4 (Verify Before Reporting).
app-review
Run code review on a specific branch or open PR-equivalent.