Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/axiomantic/spellbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/axiomantic/spellbook/dead-code-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/axiomantic/spellbook/dead-code-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/axiomantic/spellbook/dead-code-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/axiomantic/spellbook/dead-code-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/axiomantic/spellbook/dead-code-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01059 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00424 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
dead-code-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/dead-code-report
Generate comprehensive dead code report with findings, evidence, and implementation plan.
Part of the dead-code- family.* Run after /dead-code-analyze completes.
Prerequisites: Analysis complete, all items verified with verdicts.
Invariant Principles
- Evidence accompanies every finding - No verdict without grep output, caller locations, or verification proof
- Categorize by confidence - Separate high-confidence (zero callers) from transitive and write-only findings
- Ordered deletion plan - Specify safe deletion order by dependency
- Risk assessment required - Each finding includes risk level and rationale for removal
Phase 6: Report Generation
Report Template
# Dead Code Report
**Generated:** YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ
**Scope:** Branch feature/X (N commits since base)
**Items Analyzed:** N
**Dead Code Found:** N | **Alive:** N | **Transitive Dead:** N
## Summary
| Category | Dead | Alive | Notes |
|----------|------|-------|-------|
| Procedures | N | N | N transitive dead |
| Type Fields | N | N | |
| Imports | N | N | All used |
## Dead Code Findings
### High Confidence (Zero Callers)
#### 1. proc getDeferredExpr - DEAD
- **Location:** compiler/semtypes.nim:342
- **Evidence:** Zero callers in codebase
- **Search:** `grep -rn "getDeferredExpr"` → only definition found
- **Symmetric Pair:** Part of get/set/clear group; set/clear ARE used
- **Verdict:** Asymmetric API, getter never needed
- **Removal Complexity:** Simple - delete proc
### Transitive Dead Code
#### 2. proc showDeferredPragmas - TRANSITIVE DEAD
- **Location:** compiler/debug.nim:123
- **Evidence:** Only called by `dumpTypeInfo`, which is itself dead
- **Call Chain:** showDeferredPragmas ← dumpTypeInfo ← nobody
- **Verdict:** Dead because caller is dead
### Write-Only Dead Code
#### 3. iterator deferredPragmas - WRITE-ONLY DEAD
- **Location:** compiler/ast.nim:456
- **Evidence:** setDeferredExpr called 3 times, but iterator has ZERO callers
- **Write-Only Pattern:** Data is stored but never read
- **Verdict:** Entire deferred pragma storage feature is dead
## Alive Code (Verified Necessary)
#### 1. proc setDeferredExpr - ALIVE
- **Location:** compiler/semtypes.nim:349
- **Evidence:** 3 callers found
- **Callers:**
- compiler/semtypes.nim:567 (in semGenericType)
- compiler/pragmas.nim:234 (in processPragmas)
- **Verdict:** Necessary
## Implementation Plan
### Phase 1: Simple Deletions (Low Risk)
1. [ ] Delete `getDeferredExpr` proc (line 342)
2. [ ] Delete `importcExpr` field (line 237)
### Phase 2: Transitive Deletions
3. [ ] Delete `showDeferredPragmas` proc (line 123)
### Verification Commands
After each deletion, verify no references remain:
```bash
grep -rn "getDeferredExpr" compiler/ tests/
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 138 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 30adff5cda20
dead-code-report is a command published in the GitHub repository axiomantic/spellbook (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,059 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
quick-fix
Implement→review subagent loop with no planning phase, for a fix whose cause is known and whose shape is obvious, however many files it touches. No spec, no worktree, no docs or signals at the end; one audit. Routes to /subagent-diagnose on an unknown cause and to /atomic-plan on an open approach or contract choice.
optimize
Suggest concrete performance improvements for the given file or directory.
debloat
Retroactive whole-repo bloat removal (spec H-2ii). Scores an existing repo on the deterministic bloat axes, writes BLOAT-REPORT.md, and — only behind a passing test-suite safety oracle — proposes gated refactor waves as a PR. The zero-risk adoption hook.
maintain
Run automated maintenance — seeker finds bugs from pod logs and raises GitHub issues, fixer picks them up and creates PRs. Can run as a one-shot or scheduled via /schedule.
map
Generate MAP.md — a relational map of every file, function, signature, and call in the repo.
sanity
Cross-check a dekko callers/uses result against a targeted grep before trusting a low/zero count.