Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/azrtydxb/procoderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/doctor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/doctor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/doctor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/doctor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/doctor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00105 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00042 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
doctor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
The user invoked /procoder:doctor.
Run:
procoder doctor
Show the user the result. For every line marked GAP, suggest /procoder:init, which installs the missing tools with every command visible. Files of a type whose formatter is missing are reported as unchecked by the gate — never as clean — so a GAP is a hole in the gate, not a cosmetic issue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A bbb7b5cee609
doctor is a command published in the GitHub repository azrtydxb/procoder (211 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 105 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
document
On-demand documentation generation — API docs, architecture updates, user guides.
sm-buff
You usually don't run buff directly — run sm sail. sm sail drives the whole PR to green and calls buff watch / triage for you, stopping only when it needs you to act (see /sm-sail). Reach for sm buff here only for surgical work: inspecting a specific failure, or resolving a single review thread when sail has parked on…
fec-doc-sync
Sync README, docs, environment variables, scripts, API/routing/component descriptions and deployment instructions from code and project sources of truth.
logic-diff
Check two code versions for semantic equivalence — use after a refactor or rewrite.
logic-health
Sweep a whole codebase or directory for logic correctness — use before a release or to identify risk hotspots.
dotnet-critique
Deep architecture critique of pure .NET backend code. Evaluates AI slop, OOP/SOLID, layer boundaries, DI lifetimes, endpoints, SignalR, data access, concurrency, and distributed-system choices.