Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/azrtydxb/procoderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/todo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/todo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/todo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/todo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/azrtydxb/procoder/todo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00707 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
todo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
The user invoked /procoder:todo with arguments:
The command below is the procoder binary on PATH.
Tasks live as Markdown files under .procoder/todo/, one file per task.
This replaces throwaway checklists: every task carries a description that
says what "done" looks like, acceptance criteria a reviewer could verify,
and evidence of what proved them. procoder todo close is the quality
controller — it REFUSES to close a task until every criterion is checked,
the evidence is recorded, and the gate is clean. You do the work and the
verification; the binary judges.
Subcommands (run the one matching the arguments; with no arguments, run
list and report the open tasks):
-
procoder todo add <title>— prints the task file and its path. Write the file, then REPLACE the placeholders: a real description (why the task exists and what done looks like), and one- [ ]line per testable acceptance criterion. Do this before starting the work — criteria written after the fact just describe whatever happened. -
procoder todo list— every task, open first. -
procoder todo show <id>— the full task file. -
procoder todo close <id>— the quality controller. Before running it: verify each criterion yourself (run the test, exercise the behaviour), check its box only when it is true, and fill## Evidencewith what you ran and what the output proved — one line per criterion. Then close. If it refuses, it names exactly what is missing: do that work, don't game the checkboxes. A checked box you did not verify is a lie the controller cannot catch — the evidence section exists so the user can.What counts as evidence — if you haven't run the verification command fresh, you cannot check the box:
- "tests pass" = test output with 0 failures, from THIS state of the code — not an earlier run, not "should pass".
- "bug fixed" = the test for the original symptom passes — and for a regression test, the red-green proof: revert the fix, watch the test FAIL, restore, watch it pass. A regression test never seen red proves nothing.
- "build/lint clean" = the command's exit 0 and its output read, not extrapolated from a partial check.
- a subagent's "done" = verified in the diff and by running its tests yourself — an agent's success report is a claim, not evidence.
- "should", "probably", "seems to" in your evidence line means the box stays unchecked.
Rules:
- Never edit
Status:by hand — onlytodo closemoves a task to closed. - Track every piece of multi-step work here, not in throwaway TodoWrite lists: these files survive the session and the user can read them.
- When a spec exists (
procoder spec list), seed tasks from its acceptance criteria — one task per coherent group, criteria copied in.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 6583b2d862d1
todo is a command published in the GitHub repository azrtydxb/procoder (211 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 707 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
commands
Complete reference for all pair programming session commands.
session
Complete guide to managing pair programming sessions.
modes
Detailed guide to pair programming modes and their optimal use cases.
develop
Implement skill development issues with TDD-governed workflow.
sm-buff
You usually don't run buff directly — run sm sail. sm sail drives the whole PR to green and calls buff watch / triage for you, stopping only when it needs you to act (see /sm-sail). Reach for sm buff here only for surgical work: inspecting a specific failure, or resolving a single review thread when sail has parked on…
logic-diff
Check two code versions for semantic equivalence — use after a refactor or rewrite.