Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/azrtydxb/procoder/todogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/azrtydxb/procoderWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00707 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00353 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
todo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
The user invoked /procoder:todo with arguments:
The command below is the procoder binary on PATH.
Tasks live as Markdown files under .procoder/todo/, one file per task.
This replaces throwaway checklists: every task carries a description that
says what "done" looks like, acceptance criteria a reviewer could verify,
and evidence of what proved them. procoder todo close is the quality
controller — it REFUSES to close a task until every criterion is checked,
the evidence is recorded, and the gate is clean. You do the work and the
verification; the binary judges.
Subcommands (run the one matching the arguments; with no arguments, run
list and report the open tasks):
-
procoder todo add <title>— prints the task file and its path. Write the file, then REPLACE the placeholders: a real description (why the task exists and what done looks like), and one- [ ]line per testable acceptance criterion. Do this before starting the work — criteria written after the fact just describe whatever happened. -
procoder todo list— every task, open first. -
procoder todo show <id>— the full task file. -
procoder todo close <id>— the quality controller. Before running it: verify each criterion yourself (run the test, exercise the behaviour), check its box only when it is true, and fill## Evidencewith what you ran and what the output proved — one line per criterion. Then close. If it refuses, it names exactly what is missing: do that work, don't game the checkboxes. A checked box you did not verify is a lie the controller cannot catch — the evidence section exists so the user can.What counts as evidence — if you haven't run the verification command fresh, you cannot check the box:
- "tests pass" = test output with 0 failures, from THIS state of the code — not an earlier run, not "should pass".
- "bug fixed" = the test for the original symptom passes — and for a regression test, the red-green proof: revert the fix, watch the test FAIL, restore, watch it pass. A regression test never seen red proves nothing.
- "build/lint clean" = the command's exit 0 and its output read, not extrapolated from a partial check.
- a subagent's "done" = verified in the diff and by running its tests yourself — an agent's success report is a claim, not evidence.
- "should", "probably", "seems to" in your evidence line means the box stays unchecked.
Rules:
- Never edit
Status:by hand — onlytodo closemoves a task to closed. - Track every piece of multi-step work here, not in throwaway TodoWrite lists: these files survive the session and the user can read them.
- When a spec exists (
procoder spec list), seed tasks from its acceptance criteria — one task per coherent group, criteria copied in.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 57 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 6583b2d862d1
todo is a command published in the GitHub repository azrtydxb/procoder (196 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 707 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
setup
Initialize a new project with SDLC-compliant structure. Creates required files, configures build system, sets up CI/CD, and establishes quality tooling.
validate
Run SDLC compliance check against the current project. Validates build system, code quality, testing, CI/CD, security, documentation, VCS, and release configurations.
run-tests
Run automated functional tests using the hook-driven test framework. Execute the test suite to validate all project functionality.
test-report
Generate test execution report in markdown format.
add-test
Interactively add a new test definition to the test suite.
release-swarm
Orchestrate complex software releases using AI swarms that handle everything from changelog generation to multi-platform deployment.