Azure Functions Skills is a repository of agent skills, prompts, reusable definitions, MCP configuration, and telemetry hooks that give coding agents context about Azure Functions development and operations. Developers use it for guidance on triggers, bindings, runtimes, deployment, and code checks, while the catalogue contains its agent-facing add-ons.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Azure/azure-functions-skills. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Azure/azure-functions-skills/main/.github/prompts/cross-review.prompt.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/azure/azure-functions-skills/cross-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/azure/azure-functions-skills/cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/azure/azure-functions-skills/cross-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/azure/azure-functions-skills/cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/azure/azure-functions-skills/cross-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00157 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00063 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
cross-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Perform a cross-model self-review after implementation:
- Check the current model with
/model. - Switch to a different model family for independent validation:
- If currently using Claude (Ops family) → switch to the latest top-tier GPT model.
- If currently using GPT → switch to the latest top-tier Claude model.
- Run
/rubber-duckto walk through the implementation and catch blind spots. - Review the feedback for:
- Correctness and robustness
- Edge cases and error handling
- Architectural soundness
- Test coverage gaps
- Address any valid findings before finalizing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 21a7aa796704
cross-review is a command published in the GitHub repository Azure/azure-functions-skills (20 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 157 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
spec-trace-requirements
You are verifying that implementation changes trace back to specification requirements.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).