Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/architect-perms)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/architect-perms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/architect-perms/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/architect-perms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/architect-perms.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00596 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00238 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
architect-perms scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/architect-perms — Design or audit Permission Sets + Permission Set Groups
Wraps agents/permission-set-architect/AGENT.md. Two modes: design (from a persona) or audit (against the live org).
Step 1 — Collect inputs
Ask the user:
1. Mode: design or audit?
2. Target org alias (required — live-org probe in both modes)?
3. If mode = design:
Persona description (job title + objects touched + features used + sensitivity)?
Example: "SDR in NA, works Leads + Opportunities, cannot export data, light reporting"
4. If mode = audit:
Scope? org / psg:<PSG_Name> / ps:<PS_Name> / user:<username>
5. If mode = design:
Extending an existing PSG? (Optional — pass the PSG name)
If mode is design and persona is under 10 words, STOP and ask.
Step 2 — Load the agent
Read agents/permission-set-architect/AGENT.md + mandatory reads. In particular, read templates/admin/permission-set-patterns.md — it's the taxonomy the audit + design both conform to.
Step 3 — Execute the plan
Design mode:
- Decompose persona into 6 PS categories
- Probe for reusable Feature PSes (
list_permission_sets+describe_permission_set) - Propose the PSG composition
- Identify muting opportunities
- Emit metadata stubs
- Emit deployment order
Audit mode:
- Scope the probe
- Classify each PS against the taxonomy
- Detect anti-patterns (Modify All Data on persona, single-user PSes, muting PS with no parent, etc.)
- Score the org
Step 4 — Deliver the output
- Summary + confidence
- Findings table (audit) / Composition table (design)
- Metadata stubs (design only, fenced XML)
- Deployment order (design only)
- Recommended refactors (audit only)
- Process Observations
- Citations
Step 5 — Recommend follow-ups
/sharing-auditif the audit surfaced broad record-level access concerns (Wave B agent)/catalog-integrationsif integration-user permissions surfaced as findings (Wave B agent)/analyze-field-impactif FLS changes are implied/design-objectif missing objects underlie the design gap
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f201d5f67342
architect-perms is a command published in the GitHub repository BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 596 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
architect-perms compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| architect-permsBanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills | Command | 4 | 6mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |