Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/assess-waf)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/assess-waf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/assess-waf/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/assess-waf"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/assess-waf.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00306 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
assess-waf scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/assess-waf — Well-Architected Framework assessment
Wraps agents/waf-assessor/AGENT.md. Scores the org across the five WAF pillars (Trusted, Easy, Adaptable, Resilient, Composable), surfaces top risks per pillar, produces a remediation backlog.
Step 1 — Collect inputs
1. Target org alias?
2. Workload? e.g. "sales cloud + CPQ + agentforce"
3. NFRs (optional)? availability, RTO/RPO, peak TPS
4. Scope pillars (optional)? default: all 5
Step 2 — Load the agent
Read agents/waf-assessor/AGENT.md + mandatory reads.
Step 3 — Execute the plan
Workload confirmation → per-pillar probes → scoring → NFR gap analysis → backlog.
Step 4 — Deliver the output
Summary, 5-pillar scorecard, NFR sheet, pillar findings, remediation backlog, Process Observations, citations.
Step 5 — Recommend follow-ups
/audit-sharing,/catalog-integrations,/plan-release-train,/design-sandbox-strategy— one per pillar gap
What this command does NOT do
- Does not remediate (backlog only).
- Does not certify against WAF formally.
- Does not run Salesforce Optimizer (different tool).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0d91863626ab
assess-waf is a command published in the GitHub repository BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 306 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
assess-waf compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assess-wafBanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills | Command | 4 | 6mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |