Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/build-lwc)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/build-lwc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/build-lwc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/build-lwc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/build-lwc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00545 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00218 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
build-lwc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/build-lwc — Generate a Lightning Web Component bundle
Wraps agents/lwc-builder/AGENT.md. Produces .js, .html, .css, .js-meta.xml, Jest tests, and — where applicable — the matching @AuraEnabled(cacheable=true) Apex controller stub.
Step 1 — Collect inputs
Ask the user:
1. Component name (camelCase)?
2. Purpose (3+ sentences — drives markup + reactivity decisions)?
3. Surface(s) it targets? (lightning__RecordPage | lightning__AppPage |
lightning__HomePage | lightningCommunity__Page | lightning__FlowScreen | custom)
4. Data binding? (none | @wire getRecord | @wire imperative Apex | wire custom)
5. Exposed properties? (list of @api props with types)
6. Accessibility tier? (default: WCAG 2.1 AA)
If purpose is under 3 sentences or surface is unspecified, STOP.
Step 2 — Load the agent
Read agents/lwc-builder/AGENT.md + mandatory reads (lwc/component-patterns, lwc/accessibility, lwc/testing, security/lightning-locker-and-lws, plus templates under templates/lwc/).
Step 3 — Execute the plan
- Choose base skeleton from
templates/lwc/component-skeleton/. - Pick a pattern from
templates/lwc/patterns/where one fits. - Generate
.jswith reactive tracking, error handling, a11y hooks. - Generate
.htmlwith semantic markup. - Generate
.cssscoped to component. - Generate
.js-meta.xmlwith surface targets + config. - Generate Jest tests (render, error, interaction, a11y).
- If data binding uses imperative Apex, emit the matching
@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)controller stub with SecurityUtils.
Step 4 — Deliver the output
- Summary + confidence
- File bundle (fenced blocks, one per file)
- Jest tests
- Apex controller stub (if applicable) with test class
- Deployment manifest
- Process Observations
- Citations
Step 5 — Recommend follow-ups
/audit-lwcafter deploy/scan-securityon the controller Apex/gen-testsif coverage needs deepening
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3fee72764b45
build-lwc is a command published in the GitHub repository BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 545 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
build-lwc compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| build-lwcBanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills | Command | 4 | 6mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |