Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/design-path)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/design-path"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/design-path/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/design-path"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/design-path.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00483 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00193 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
design-path scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/design-path — Design or audit a Sales/Service Path
Wraps agents/path-designer/AGENT.md. Produces Key Fields per step, Guidance for Success text (≤ 200 chars), celebration triggers, and the validation-rule harness that gates progression.
Step 1 — Collect inputs
Ask the user:
1. Mode? design | audit
2. Target org alias (required — agent probes existing Paths + picklist values)?
3. Object? Opportunity | Lead | Case | Contract | Order | Custom Object
4. Stage picklist API name? (e.g. StageName, Status)
5. Record type (if object uses record types)?
6. Celebration condition (optional)?
Example: "on close-won when Amount > 500000"
If the picklist has fewer than 3 values, STOP — Path is over-engineered for this.
Step 2 — Load the agent
Read agents/path-designer/AGENT.md + mandatory reads (admin/path-setup, admin/guidance-for-success, admin/validation-rule-patterns).
Step 3 — Execute the plan
- Enumerate picklist values in picklist sort order.
- For each value: choose Key Fields (3–5) from the record.
- Author Guidance for Success (≤ 200 chars, imperative voice).
- Design VR harness that enforces required-for-stage fields (with bypass Custom Permission).
- Encode celebration trigger if supplied.
Step 4 — Deliver the output
- Summary + confidence
- Per-step table: stage, Key Fields, Guidance for Success
- VR harness (pseudo-XML)
- Celebration config
- Audit findings (stale paths, drift, missing guidance, orphaned VRs)
- Process Observations
- Citations
Step 5 — Recommend follow-ups
/design-sales-stagesif Opportunity stage ladder needs redesign before Path/audit-validation-rulesafter VRs deploy/architect-permsfor the bypass Custom Permission
What this command does NOT do
- Does not deploy Path metadata.
- Does not edit the underlying picklist — if gaps exist, flags and recommends
/govern-picklists. - Does not train reps on the Path UI.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 71 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A add7fe101b7c
design-path is a command published in the GitHub repository BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 483 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
design-path compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| design-pathBanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills | Command | 4 | 6mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |