review-agentforce-action

review-agentforce-action is a command for Claude Code from BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills. It costs 0 tokens per session (281 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A command that reviews Agentforce agents and their actions using scorecards, guardrail checks, observability checks, and persona review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess the quality and safety of an Agentforce agent without changing the agent or deploying it.
Why use it?
It helps find unclear topics, missing safety controls, weak handoffs, and gaps in how agent actions can be monitored.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

Good fit Use it to assess the quality and safety of an Agentforce agent without changing the agent or deploying it.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/review-agentforce-action
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-agentforce-action

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/review-agentforce-action/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/review-agentforce-action)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/review-agentforce-action"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/review-agentforce-action/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-agentforce-action

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/review-agentforce-action"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/review-agentforce-action.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 281 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00281
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00140
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00056
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00028

Measured 9d ago against content hash 9152fea978ed, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-agentforce-action scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/review-agentforce-action.md · 37 lines

What it actually says

/review-agentforce-action — Review Agentforce agent/action quality

Wraps agents/agentforce-action-reviewer/AGENT.md. Per-action A–F scorecard, topic coherence, guardrails gap list, observability and persona review.


Step 1 — Collect inputs

1. Agent id or agent developer name?
2. Target org alias?
3. Review depth?  topic_only | per_action (default)

Step 2 — Load the agent

Read agents/agentforce-action-reviewer/AGENT.md + mandatory reads.

Step 3 — Execute the plan

Fetch agent + topics + actions → per-action scoring → topic coherence → guardrails → persona + handoff → observability → remediation plan.

Step 4 — Deliver the output

Summary, per-action scorecard, topic coherence table, guardrails gaps, observability + persona review, remediation plan, Process Observations, citations.

Step 5 — Recommend follow-ups

  • /govern-prompt-library for template sprawl
  • /catalog-integrations if agent actions do callouts

What this command does NOT do

  • Does not modify agents, topics, actions, or prompts.
  • Does not deploy or activate agents.
  • Does not generate agent test data.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 37 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9152fea978ed

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-agentforce-action is a command published in the GitHub repository BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 281 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.