Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/scan-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/scan-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/scan-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/scan-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/scan-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00441 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
scan-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/scan-security — Security audit for Apex, callouts, and sharing
Wraps agents/security-scanner/AGENT.md. Walks a force-app/ tree and flags CRUD/FLS, sharing, callout-without-Named-Credential, and hardcoded-secret issues.
Step 1 — Collect inputs
Ask:
1. What scope should be scanned?
Example: force-app/main/default/
2. Target-org alias? (optional)
3. Severity threshold? (default P2 — show all; use P1 to hide low-severity)
Step 2 — Load the agent
Read agents/security-scanner/AGENT.md in full + every reference under Mandatory Reads Before Starting, especially standards/decision-trees/sharing-selection.md.
Step 3 — Execute
Follow the 6-step plan:
- Class-level checks (sharing keyword, unescaped SOQL, callouts, hardcoded secrets)
- DML-level checks (CRUD/FLS)
- SOQL-level checks (WITH SECURITY_ENFORCED / USER_MODE)
- Config-level checks (Remote Sites, debug logs with secrets)
- Decision-tree routing for sharing findings
- (Optional)
validate_against_orglookup for existingSecurityUtilsequivalents
Step 4 — Deliver
- Summary counts by severity and confidence
- Findings table
- Per-finding before/after for P0 and P1
- Hardcoded-secret summary with
[REDACTED]placeholder — never print secret values - Citations
Step 5 — Recommend follow-ups
/refactor-apexfor classes that needSecurityUtilsintegrated/score-deploymentbefore shipping security fixes to production/request-skillif a finding type has no canonical skill yet
What this command does NOT do
- Does not modify any file.
- Does not print secret values in the output — always
[REDACTED]. - Does not replace professional penetration testing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 63754de41904
scan-security is a command published in the GitHub repository BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (4 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 441 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
scan-security compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scan-securityBanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills | Command | 4 | 6mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |