Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/basher83/lunar-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/basher83/lunar-claude/new-sdk-app)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/basher83/lunar-claude/new-sdk-app"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/basher83/lunar-claude/new-sdk-app/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/basher83/lunar-claude/new-sdk-app"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/basher83/lunar-claude/new-sdk-app.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.01923 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00962 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00385 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
new-sdk-app scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 211 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are tasked with helping the user create a new Claude Agent SDK application using Python. Follow these steps carefully:
Reference Documentation
Before starting, use the claude-agent-sdk skill to ensure you follow SDK best practices:
# Load the skill to access patterns and examples
/skill claude-agent-sdk
The skill provides:
- SDK templates (assets/sdk-template.py)
- Official examples (examples/)
- Best practices and patterns (references/)
- Validation checklist (assets/sdk-validation-checklist.md)
Also reference the official documentation:
- Python SDK reference: https://docs.claude.com/en/api/agent-sdk/python
IMPORTANT: Always check for and use the latest SDK version (targeting >= 0.1.6).
Gather Requirements
IMPORTANT: Ask these questions one at a time. Wait for the user's response before asking the next question. This makes it easier for the user to respond.
Ask the questions in this order (skip any that the user has already provided via arguments):
-
Project name (ask first): "What would you like to name your project?"
- If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use that as the project name and skip this question
- Wait for response before continuing
-
Agent type (ask second, but skip if #1 was sufficiently detailed): "What kind of agent are you building? Some examples:
- Coding agent (SRE, security review, code review)
- Orchestrator with subagents (multi-agent workflows)
- Business agent (customer support, content creation)
- Custom agent (describe your use case)"
- Wait for response before continuing
-
Starting point (ask third): "Would you like:
- A minimal query() example for simple tasks
- A ClaudeSDKClient example for multi-turn conversations
- An orchestrator with subagents
- Start from the SDK template (assets/sdk-template.py)"
- Wait for response before continuing
-
Project structure (ask fourth): "What project structure would you prefer:
- Single-file uv script (self-contained with
# /// scriptheader) - Standard Python project with pyproject.toml"
- Wait for response before continuing
- Single-file uv script (self-contained with
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 211 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 18dd8a440460
new-sdk-app is a command published in the GitHub repository basher83/lunar-claude (23 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,923 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
type-coverage
Vérification Couverture des Types Python.
execute-pydantic-ai-prp
Implement a Pydantic AI agent using the PRP file.
fastapi
FastAPI application design and implementation conventions. Use this skill when building, updating, or reviewing FastAPI services, routers, dependencies, request/response schemas, streaming endpoints, or API tests. Trigger on FastAPI-specific work such as path operation design, dependency injection, response models…
scaffold-service
Scaffold a thin ArchiPy FastAPI or gRPC service under services/{domain}/v{n}/.
savant-python
Python performance optimization with Python Developer agent.
python-review
Comprehensive Python code review for PEP 8 compliance, type hints, security, and Pythonic idioms. Invokes the python-reviewer agent.