Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to basher83/lunar-claude. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/basher83/lunar-claude/main/.claude/commands/verify-pr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/basher83/lunar-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/basher83/lunar-claude/verify-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/basher83/lunar-claude/verify-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/basher83/lunar-claude/verify-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.01969 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00984 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
verify-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- verify-pr — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 325 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task: Verify Pull Request Claims
PR to verify: $ARGUMENTS
Purpose: Verify that a PR's description, commits, and plan match actual implementation.
Core 4 Foundation:
- Context: PR metadata + git changes + plan documents
- Model: Semantic verification capabilities
- Prompt: This systematic verification process
- Tools: Git commands, gh CLI, file operations
Instructions
You are verifying a pull request. Check that claims in PR description, commits, and plans match actual code changes.
Core Principles
- Evidence before claims: Never mark verified without git command output proving it
- Verify behavior, not names: Check what code DOES. Different filenames can provide same functionality.
- Counter-evidence first: Define what would disprove claim BEFORE checking
- Cross-reference patterns: If comparing implementations, check what feature IS first
Step 1: Identify PR and Extract Claims
Determine PR Type
The argument could be:
- Branch name:
cursor/implement-plan-from-cu-plan-md-11ba - PR number:
#7or7 - Comparison:
main...feature-branch
Commands to identify:
# If branch name given, check if it exists
git show-ref --verify refs/heads/$ARGUMENTS 2>/dev/null || git show-ref --verify refs/remotes/origin/$ARGUMENTS
# If looks like PR number, try gh
gh pr view $ARGUMENTS 2>/dev/null
# Get comparison syntax
git log --oneline main...$ARGUMENTS | head -10
Extract Claims
From PR description (if available):
gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json body -q .body
From commit messages:
git log --format="%s%n%b" main...$ARGUMENTS
From referenced plan documents:
# Look for plan references in commits or PR description
git log main...$ARGUMENTS | grep -i "plan\|spec\|requirement"
Common claim patterns to extract:
- "Adds feature X"
- "Fixes bug Y"
- "Implements Z from plan"
- "Includes tests"
- "Updates documentation"
- "Breaking change"
- "Closes #123"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 325 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 217f10018be6
verify-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository basher83/lunar-claude (22 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 1,969 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
security-review
AI-powered security review of the current git diff (or specified paths). Dispatches the security-reviewer agent and prints findings grouped by severity.
code-review
Review a PR diff for code-level defects (security, correctness, performance, maintainability) and post a severity-tagged review comment. Complements /verify-pr's AC-conformance check.