Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to BenchBox-dev/BenchBox. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BenchBox-dev/BenchBox/develop/.claude/commands/blind-spot.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BenchBox-dev/BenchBoxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/benchbox-dev/benchbox/blind-spot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/benchbox-dev/benchbox/blind-spot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/benchbox-dev/benchbox/blind-spot.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00769 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00385 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
blind-spot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
- Branch: !
git branch --show-current - Date/time: !
date +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M%S - Unsynced drafts: !
ls ~/.benchbox/finding-drafts/*.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' '
Your task
Follow docs/agent/review-protocol.md exactly. Apply the
defect gate [REVIEW-DEFECT-001] before anything else: a finding that
materially affects correctness, performance, or security is a defect, not a
blind spot. If the gate triggers, refuse to file and offer the user the
TODO / inline-fix / escalation menu instead. If the gate passes:
-
Pick the slug. Derive a 3–6 word kebab-case slug capturing the class, not the instance. Example: "react keys collide on platform name" →
react-key-collision-class. If the user gave nothing, ask one short clarifying question and stop. -
Compose the path
~/.benchbox/finding-drafts/YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS-<slug>.mdusing the timestamp from the Context block above (runmkdir -p ~/.benchbox/finding-draftsfirst). Drafts live outside every worktree — capture needs no credentials and no network, and per[REVIEW-CAPTURE-001]the draft file is the sole in-review write for a finding. Filename stem must equal theidfield in the frontmatter. If the path collides, append-2,-3, … before.md. -
Write the file using the frontmatter schema and body shape in
_project/blind-spots/README.md(storage spec). Required fields areid, date, status, finding_kind, review_context. Optional capture fields:observed_shaandevidence(a list of{path, pattern, note}) for provenance; leave the triage fields (urgency,breadth,confidence) unset — they are assigned later at triage, never required at capture. -
Validate:
uv run --project _project/scripts -- python _project/scripts/validate_blind_spot.py ~/.benchbox/finding-drafts/<filename>If validation fails, fix the frontmatter and re-run.
-
Report with
Recorded: ~/.benchbox/finding-drafts/<filename>.mdand a quote of the body. Stop there — do not commit, do not push, do not runmake pr-open, and do not write the finding into the tracker database. Per[REVIEW-CAPTURE-001]the draft file is local-only; syncing it into the tracker (todo finding sync) is a separate, user-authorized landing step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 59 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A e72cbdd831d0
blind-spot is a command published in the GitHub repository BenchBox-dev/BenchBox (12 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 769 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
review-sdk-app
Review and validate a Claude Agent SDK application against best practices.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.