test-coverage

A command that measures how much of a codebase is covered by automated tests, finds untested areas, and creates tests for missing cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run the project’s configured test tool, inspect uncovered files and lines, and generate tests intended to meet the configured target, or 80% when no target is set.
Why use it?
It shows where tests are missing and checks the project’s configured coverage requirement instead of assuming one.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/benkapner/claude-code-basecamp/test-coverage
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,131 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00019 $0.01131
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00566
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00226
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00113

Measured 3d ago against content hash 3d2ae5b72b3e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/test-coverage.md · 125 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test Coverage Command

Analyze test coverage, identify gaps, and generate missing tests.

Instructions

Step 0: Detect Test Runner and Coverage Target

Before running anything, detect the project's test runner and coverage target from config:

# Check for test runner config
cat pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null | grep -A5 'tool.pytest\|tool.coverage\|tool.unittest'
cat setup.cfg 2>/dev/null | grep -A5 'tool:pytest\|coverage'
cat pytest.ini 2>/dev/null
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | grep -E '"test"|"jest"|"mocha"|"vitest"'
  • Test runner: use whatever the project configures (pytest, unittest, jest, vitest, etc.). Fall back to pytest only if nothing is configured and pyproject.toml exists.
  • Coverage target: read from pyproject.toml ([tool.coverage.report]fail_under), setup.cfg, or .coveragerc. Fall back to 80% only if no target is configured.

If no test runner is detected, ask the user: "couldn't detect the test runner — what does this project use?"

Step 1: Run Coverage

Use the detected test runner. For pytest:

pytest --cov --cov-report=term-missing -q

Step 2: Analyze Coverage Report

  1. Parse the coverage output
  2. List files below the coverage target, sorted worst-first
  3. For each under-covered file, identify:
    • Untested functions or methods
    • Missing branch coverage (if/else, try/except, early returns)
    • Dead code that inflates the denominator

If pytest/coverage is not available, perform static analysis instead:

  1. List all source files and their corresponding test files
  2. Flag source files with NO test file
  3. For files with tests, list public functions/methods that have no test
  4. Estimate coverage percentage based on tested vs untested functions

Testing Priority Classification:

  • HIGH: Core business logic, security-sensitive functions, public APIs, complex algorithms, data pipeline stages
  • MEDIUM: Utility functions, configuration loading, error handling paths
  • LOW: Simple getters/setters, trivial wrappers, logging-only code

Read the full file on GitHub · 125 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 125 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 3d2ae5b72b3e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-coverage is a command published in the GitHub repository Benkapner/claude-code-basecamp (16 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,131 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.