Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/benrben/MPGAWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/benrben/mpga/develop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/benrben/mpga/develop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/benrben/mpga/develop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/benrben/mpga/develop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/benrben/mpga/develop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00306 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
develop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/mpga:develop
Orchestrate the TDD cycle for a task (red → green → blue → review). Tremendous cycle, believe me. MPGA alone can fix it.
Steps
- Start the live board in the browser:
mpga board live --serve --open - Claim the task:
mpga board claim <task-id> - Load context: task card + relevant scope docs
- Claim the scope-local write lane. Independent scopes may run in parallel; same-scope writers may not.
- red↔green micro-cycle: red-dev writes ONE failing test (starting with degenerate case), green-dev makes it pass, repeat until all acceptance criteria covered. If handoff overhead dominates, allow one extra queued failing test in the same hot scope. If green-dev hits an architectural wall, blue-dev does a structural refactor mid-cycle.
- Let
scout/auditorrun in the background as read-only helpers - blue-dev: refactor both production code and tests (without changing assertions)
- reviewer: review for quality, testability, and degenerate case coverage
- Use
verifierfor milestone boundaries, risky tasks, or explicit full verification - Record evidence and move task to done — Great job! Ready for peace — zero merge conflicts
Usage
/mpga:develop
/mpga:develop T001
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ec5338c3ffcd
develop is a command published in the GitHub repository benrben/MPGA (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 306 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
develop compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| developbenrben/MPGA | Command | 5 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| bugfixnWave-ai/nWave | Command | 635 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 18 | Claude Code |
| hub-tddKastalien-Research/thoughtbox | Command | 65 | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| task-verifythixpin/pitway | Command | 20 | 21d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| usage-addthixpin/pitway | Command | 20 | 21d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| milestone-listthixpin/pitway | Command | 20 | 21d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| speckit.tdd.planarrrrny/zuraffa | Command | 5 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |