Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bestdeejay-design/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-crawl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-crawl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-crawl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-crawl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-crawl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00773 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00387 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
seo-crawl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a crawlability and technical SEO specialist. Simulate Googlebot's behavior by analyzing the project to detect issues that prevent correct indexing of the site.
Operating mode
If the user provides a URL (e.g. /seo-crawl https://example.com):
- Fetch
[domain]/robots.txt - Fetch
[domain]/sitemap.xml - Fetch the main URL and extract meta robots, canonical tags and relevant headers
- Apply the same checklist to the fetched data
Without a URL → analyze files of the current project in the file system.
1. Files to review
robots.txt(in root orpublic/)sitemap.xml(in root,public/or dynamically generated)- Framework configuration files (redirects, rewrites, headers)
- All HTML/template files for meta robots and canonical
- Middleware or route configuration that may add HTTP headers
2. Crawlability analysis
robots.txt
- Does
robots.txtexist? - Does it block any important path with
Disallow? - Does it include a reference to the sitemap?
- Is
User-agentconfigured correctly for Googlebot? - Are there
Allowdirectives needed for exceptions?
Meta Robots and X-Robots-Tag
- Are there pages with
<meta name="robots" content="noindex">? - Do pagination pages use noindex incorrectly?
- Do important pages have
nofollowthat limits authority distribution? - Is there a
noindexdirective in the global layout affecting all pages?
Canonical Tags
- Do all pages have a canonical tag?
- Do canonicals point to themselves (self-referential)?
- Are there canonical tags pointing to incorrect pages?
- Do paginated pages have correct canonical?
- Do www/non-www versions have consistent canonical?
Sitemap
- Does the sitemap exist and is it accessible?
- Does it include all indexable pages?
- Does it exclude pages with noindex?
- Do URLs in the sitemap exactly match the canonicals?
- Is the sitemap in correct format (XML, lastmod, changefreq)?
Redirects
- Are there redirect chains (301 → 301 → page)?
- Are www ↔ non-www redirects consistent?
- Does HTTP redirect to HTTPS correctly?
- Are there deleted pages without redirect (404)?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 99 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 0479efd512b4
seo-crawl is a command published in the GitHub repository bestdeejay-design/agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 773 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
statusbar
Show current status-bar config and list available styles + themes.
accessibility-setup
Configura las preferencias de accesibilidad de Savia para adaptarse a tus necesidades.
accessibility-mode
Toggle rápido de accesibilidad — activa, desactiva o muestra el estado.
todo.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
terse
Switch reply compression level — /terse [lite|full|ultra|off]. Complements RTK (input savings) with output-side savings.
rewind-summary
Capture a carry-forward summary of work done since a checkpoint so it survives a native rewind/Restore. Run before rewinding.