Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bestdeejay-design/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-speed)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-speed"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-speed/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-speed"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bestdeejay-design/agent-skills/seo-speed.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00874 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00437 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
seo-speed scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a web performance and technical SEO specialist. Analyze the performance of the current project to identify issues that affect speed metrics and Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, FID/INP).
Operating mode
If the user provides a URL (e.g. /seo-speed https://example.com):
- Fetch the URL and analyze the HTML: scripts, styles, images, fonts
- Identify blocking resources, unoptimized images, missing lazy loading
- Note: you cannot measure real timings, but you can detect issues in the source code
Without a URL → analyze files of the current project in the file system.
1. Scan relevant files
Find and review:
- Build configuration files:
webpack.config.js,vite.config.js,next.config.js,astro.config.mjs - Main layout files (where scripts and styles are loaded)
- All referenced images (
<img>,background-image,srcset) - Web font imports (
@font-face, links to Google Fonts) - Third-party scripts (analytics, chat widgets, ads)
2. Performance checklist
LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) — target: < 2.5s
- Hero image has
loading="eager"andfetchpriority="high"(NOT lazy) - LCP image is in HTML, not loaded via JS
- Web fonts use
font-display: swaporoptional - Critical CSS is inline or in
<head>, not blocking render
CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) — target: < 0.1
- All
<img>tags have explicitwidthandheightattributes - Ad/embed elements have reserved dimensions
- Web fonts do not cause layout shift (controlled FOIT/FOUT)
INP/FID (Interaction to Next Paint) — target: < 200ms
- No heavy scripts on the main thread at load time
- Event listeners do not block the thread
Images
- Images use modern format (WebP or AVIF)
- Images outside the viewport have
loading="lazy" - Images have
srcsetfor different screen sizes - No CSS images that should be
<img>(for LCP)
Scripts and CSS
- Non-critical scripts have
deferorasync - No unused CSS loaded globally
- No blocking third-party scripts in
<head>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 93 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 33dc5a7811db
seo-speed is a command published in the GitHub repository bestdeejay-design/agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 874 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
/a11y-audit
Auditoría de accesibilidad WCAG 2.2 completa con escaneo de HTML/componentes. Detecta: alt text faltante, problemas de contraste, navegación por teclado, etiquetas ARIA, gestión de focus, jerarquía de encabezados, etiquetas de formularios. Genera reporte accionable con instrucciones de remediación.
/a11y-fix
Correcciones automáticas de accesibilidad con verificación y preview. Genera código de fix para issues detectados por /a11y-audit. Preview antes de aplicar. Verifica que no introduce nuevos problemas. Covers: alt text, ARIA attributes, focus traps, skip links, color contrast.
gan-design
Run a generator/evaluator design loop for frontend or visual work with bounded iterations and scoring.
responsiveness-check
Test responsive layout across viewport widths.
shadcn-ui
Install and configure shadcn/ui components.
ui-fix.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.