Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bitflight-devops/skilllintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/docs-update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/docs-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/docs-update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/docs-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/docs-update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00511 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00255 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
gsd:docs-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to gsd-docs-update — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Flag handling rule:
- The optional flags documented below are available behaviors, not implied active behaviors
- A flag is active only when its literal token appears in
$ARGUMENTS - If a documented flag is absent from
$ARGUMENTS, treat it as inactive --force: skip preservation prompts, regenerate all docs regardless of existing content or GSD markers--verify-only: check existing docs for accuracy against codebase, no generation (full verification requires Phase 4 verifier)- If
--forceand--verify-onlyboth appear in$ARGUMENTS,--forcetakes precedence
<execution_context> @./.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/docs-update.md </execution_context>
Available optional flags (documentation only — not automatically active):
--force— Regenerate all docs. Overwrites hand-written and GSD docs alike. No preservation prompts.--verify-only— Check existing docs for accuracy against the codebase. No files are written. Reports VERIFY marker count. Full codebase fact-checking requires the gsd-doc-verifier agent (Phase 4).
Active flags must be derived from $ARGUMENTS:
--forceis active only if the literal--forcetoken is present in$ARGUMENTS--verify-onlyis active only if the literal--verify-onlytoken is present in$ARGUMENTS- If neither token appears, run the standard full-phase generation flow
- Do not infer that a flag is active just because it is documented in this prompt
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 50 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 360299f5b030
gsd:docs-update is a command published in the GitHub repository bitflight-devops/skilllint (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 511 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to gsd-docs-update, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
brand-generate
Generate an on-brand document from a saved Brand Profile.
prose-review-docs
Reviews markdown documentation files or directories against the active prose style rules — the plugin's vendor-neutral baseline plus your organization's overlay when one is configured. Accepts a file path or directory (recursive). Runs prose-style-checker and optionally Vale. Supports --fix to auto-apply safe…
cti-report
Render case deliverables — relationship graph (PNG/SVG/Mermaid) and a polished PDF/DOCX assessment. Usage: /cti-report [--graph|--pdf].
ppt-image2-editable-rebuild
Rebuild image2 or imagegen reference slides as editable PowerPoint decks.
render-figures
Compile all .tex and .typ figure files in a directory.
harness-onboarding
Generate a human-readable onboarding document from HARNESS.md, AGENTS.md, and REFLECTIONLOG.md — a friendly guide for new team members.