Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bitflight-devops/skilllintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/ns-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/ns-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/ns-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/ns-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/ns-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to gsd-quality — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent.
gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.
| User wants | Invoke |
|---|---|
| Review code for quality and correctness | gsd-code-review |
| Auto-fix code review findings | gsd-code-review --fix |
| Audit UAT / acceptance testing | gsd-audit-uat |
| Security review of a phase | gsd-secure-phase |
| Evaluate AI response quality | gsd-eval-review |
| Review UI for design and accessibility | gsd-ui-review |
| Validate phase outputs | gsd-validate-phase |
| Debug a failing feature or error | gsd-debug |
| Forensic investigation of a broken system | gsd-forensics |
Invoke the matched skill directly using the Skill tool.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 27 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 19d9f1fbcf67
gsd-quality is a command published in the GitHub repository bitflight-devops/skilllint (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 242 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to gsd-quality, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor-clean
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
codebase-review
Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.
modify
Command "modify" from MartyBonacci/specswarm, covering user input, flag parsing, parse flags from arguments, mode routing and goal.
ia-report-bug
Report a bug in the whetstone plugin.
harness:audit
Cross-dimensional codebase audit orchestrator — classify repo shape, fan out parallel read-only audit agents, dedup and severity-rank findings against existing issues, publish grouped tracking issues.
deep-audit.skeleton
Aciklama: Bu bolum Bootstrap tarafindan manifest verileriyle doldurulur. Gerekli manifest alanlari: project.description, stack.primary, project.structure, project.subprojects, stack.orm, stack.authmethod Ornek cikti.