Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/reapply-patchesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bitflight-devops/skilllintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/reapply-patches)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/reapply-patches"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bitflight-devops/skilllint/reapply-patches.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00945 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00473 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
reapply-patches scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- reapply-patches — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Step 1: Detect backed-up patches
Check for local patches directory:
# Global install — detect runtime config directory
if [ -d "$HOME/.config/opencode/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
PATCHES_DIR="$HOME/.config/opencode/gsd-local-patches"
elif [ -d "$HOME/.opencode/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
PATCHES_DIR="$HOME/.opencode/gsd-local-patches"
elif [ -d "$HOME/.gemini/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
PATCHES_DIR="$HOME/.gemini/gsd-local-patches"
else
PATCHES_DIR="./.claude/gsd-local-patches"
fi
# Local install fallback — check all runtime directories
if [ ! -d "$PATCHES_DIR" ]; then
for dir in .config/opencode .opencode .gemini .claude; do
if [ -d "./$dir/gsd-local-patches" ]; then
PATCHES_DIR="./$dir/gsd-local-patches"
break
fi
done
fi
Read backup-meta.json from the patches directory.
If no patches found:
No local patches found. Nothing to reapply.
Local patches are automatically saved when you run /gsd:update
after modifying any GSD workflow, command, or agent files.
Exit.
Step 2: Show patch summary
## Local Patches to Reapply
**Backed up from:** v{from_version}
**Current version:** {read VERSION file}
**Files modified:** {count}
| # | File | Status |
|---|------|--------|
| 1 | {file_path} | Pending |
| 2 | {file_path} | Pending |
Step 3: Merge each file
For each file in backup-meta.json:
-
Read the backed-up version (user's modified copy from
gsd-local-patches/) -
Read the newly installed version (current file after update)
-
Compare and merge:
- If the new file is identical to the backed-up file: skip (modification was incorporated upstream)
- If the new file differs: identify the user's modifications and apply them to the new version
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 124 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 2c8d06790e80
reapply-patches is a command published in the GitHub repository bitflight-devops/skilllint (6 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 945 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.