Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bjcho4141/harness-bujangWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-status/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-status.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00440 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00176 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
bujang-status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/bujang-status
Print a structured status report of the harness install in the current project.
Action — run the CLI status check
The harness-bujang CLI on npm runs all the install verification (agents, CLAUDE.md section, placeholder check, learning log, chat DB). Run:
npx harness-bujang@latest status .
This prints a summary like:
📋 Harness-Bujang status — <project>
Agents
✓ director.md
...
CLAUDE.md
✓ Section present, no unfilled placeholders
Learning log
✓ docs/AGENT_LEARNING_LOG.md
Chat room (.harness/chat.db)
✓ present — open with: bujang chat (or - not yet created)
Overall: 🟢 healthy / 🟡 partial / 🔴 not installed
Recent chat activity (extra)
The CLI does NOT query the chat database. To read recent harness_messages entries from the local SQLite chat DB:
sqlite3 .harness/chat.db \
"SELECT created_at, from_role, to_role, substr(body, 1, 60) FROM harness_messages ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 10"
After collecting the data, format it into a Recent chat (last N): block and append it under the CLI's output.
When status reports issues
- If agents are missing → suggest
/bujang-init(ornpx harness-bujang@latest init --yesto overwrite) - If CLAUDE.md section missing → same
- If
.harness/chat.dbnot yet created → suggest/open-chat(ornpx harness-bujang chat --create) to create it on first run
Print a single-line fix suggestion for each red/yellow item — never leave the user guessing what to do next.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 8a6dee26ddab
bujang-status is a command published in the GitHub repository bjcho4141/harness-bujang (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 440 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
bujang-status compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bujang-statusbjcho4141/harness-bujang | Command | 7 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |