Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bjcho4141/harness-bujangWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-team)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-team/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bjcho4141/harness-bujang/bujang-team.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00775 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00310 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
bujang-team scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/bujang-team
Direct shortcut to invoke one of the specialist teams without going through the full Director dispatch flow.
Usage
/bujang-team <team-name> <task>
Examples:
/bujang-team code-review-team review the latest commit
/bujang-team security-team audit the new payment endpoint
/bujang-team db-guard-team verify the migration in supabase/migrations/00031_*
/bujang-team qa-team run scenarios for the cart flow
Action — execute now
Parse <team-name> and <task> from the user's command arguments.
Step 1. Validate team name
The team name MUST be one of:
dev-team— actual code workarchitect-team— structure design / reviewdoc-sync-team— docs synccode-review-team— convention / readability reviewsecurity-team— auth / permissions / PII / XSS auditdb-guard-team— schema / FK / migration auditqa-team— functional / scenario verificationverifier-team— final build + regression gateconsultant— external benchmarking / industry advice
If invalid, print the list above and stop.
Step 2. Log the dispatch (chat-room write)
If the project has a chat-room DB configured, INSERT a row before invoking the agent. Use the project's existing pattern — look at lib/harness-db/ (if installed) or app/api/harness/reply/route.ts for the canonical write path.
SQLite (default):
sqlite3 .harness/chat.db <<'SQL'
INSERT INTO harness_messages (from_role, to_role, type, severity, body)
VALUES ('director', '<team-name>', 'command', 'info', '<task>');
SQL
Supabase: hit the project's own /api/harness/reply route (or INSERT via the service-role client).
If no chat DB is configured (agents-only install), skip this step.
Step 3. Invoke the agent
Use the Agent tool:
Agent({
subagent_type: "<team-name>",
description: "<2-4 word summary of the task>",
prompt: "<the user's task verbatim, plus any project context the agent needs>"
})
Step 4. Log the return
After the agent returns its report, INSERT a return-trip row:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 3bc37c3c1574
bujang-team is a command published in the GitHub repository bjcho4141/harness-bujang (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 775 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
bujang-team compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bujang-teambjcho4141/harness-bujang | Command | 7 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |