Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Blakeem/AI-Prompt-Guide-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/blakeem/ai-prompt-guide-mcp/coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/blakeem/ai-prompt-guide-mcp/coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/blakeem/ai-prompt-guide-mcp/coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/blakeem/ai-prompt-guide-mcp/coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/blakeem/ai-prompt-guide-mcp/coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.00058 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00012 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Coverage
⚠️ REQUIRED WORKFLOW - You MUST follow these instructions:
Load workflow via get_workflow (once per conversation):
get_workflow({ workflow: "coverage" })
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 670eaee9b897
coverage is a command published in the GitHub repository Blakeem/AI-Prompt-Guide-MCP (5 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 58 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
cloudflare-durable-objects:setup
Interactive Durable Objects project initialization. Scaffolds new DO project with proper bindings, migrations, and boilerplate code.
cloudflare-workers:test-setup
Interactive Vitest setup wizard for Cloudflare Workers testing. Configures @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers, mocks bindings, and creates example tests.
cloudflare-workflows:test
Test workflow instances locally and remotely with validation and metrics. Use when user wants to test workflow execution, validate behavior, or measure performance.
ux-grill
Use when a running web app's UX has to be audited reproducibly rather than by feel — a deterministic mechanical pass over routes and viewports (axe, target size, horizontal overflow, page title, scripted journeys) followed by a screenshot-grounded interrogation of the operator, journey by journey, with two persona…
test-audit
Use when writing, reviewing, or pruning tests. Three modes, one value bar: a four-question gate before any new test is written, a focused audit of one scope, and a campaign over a whole repo or subsystem that removes the least useful tests under a coverage guard. Every delete, merge, or repair carries written evidence…
test
Agentic end-to-end test orchestrator — drive web/macOS flows, evaluate UX rubric, reconcile issues.