Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amritWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/checkpoint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/checkpoint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/checkpoint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/checkpoint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/checkpoint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01126 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00563 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
checkpoint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/checkpoint — Progress Checkpoints
Create, verify, or list named progress checkpoints. Each checkpoint captures a git snapshot, file state, and test status.
Modes
| Mode | Usage | What It Does |
|---|---|---|
create |
/checkpoint create core-done |
Snapshot current state as a named checkpoint |
verify |
/checkpoint verify core-done |
Compare current state against a checkpoint |
list |
/checkpoint list |
Show all checkpoints with status |
Typical Flow
feature-start → core-done → tests-pass → refactored → pr-ready
Instructions
Step 1: Parse Arguments
From $ARGUMENTS, determine:
- Mode:
create,verify, orlist(default:createif a name is given,listif no arguments) - Checkpoint name: Kebab-case identifier (e.g.,
core-done,tests-pass)
Step 2: Ensure Directory
mkdir -p .planning/checkpoints
Step 3: Execute Mode
Mode: CREATE
- Capture git state:
git rev-parse HEAD
git status --short
git diff --stat
- Capture file manifest:
# List all tracked files with their hashes
git ls-files -s | head -100
- Run tests and record status:
# Auto-detect and run
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then npm test 2>&1 | tail -10; fi
if [ -f "pyproject.toml" ]; then pytest 2>&1 | tail -10; fi
if [ -f "Cargo.toml" ]; then cargo test 2>&1 | tail -10; fi
- Save checkpoint to
.planning/checkpoints/[name].md:
---
name: [checkpoint-name]
created: [ISO timestamp]
commit: [git hash]
branch: [branch name]
tests: pass|fail|skip
dirty_files: [count]
---
# Checkpoint: [name]
## Git State
- **Commit:** [hash]
- **Branch:** [branch]
- **Clean:** yes/no
- **Dirty files:** [list if any]
## Test Status
- **Result:** PASS / FAIL / SKIPPED
- **Details:** [summary]
## Files Snapshot
[List of key files and their git hashes at this point]
## Notes
[Any context about what this checkpoint represents]
- Present confirmation:
## Checkpoint Created: [name]
- **Commit:** [short hash]
- **Tests:** PASS/FAIL
- **Files tracked:** [count]
- **Stored at:** `.planning/checkpoints/[name].md`
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 176 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 2674e83c6703
checkpoint is a command published in the GitHub repository boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,126 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
commit
A command that examines staged Git changes and proposes a commit message using the Conventional Commits format, such as feat, fix, or docs. Git is a tool for tracking changes to code.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
release-notes
Generate consistent, well-structured release notes from git history. Triggered on release tags following semver patterns (v..) to produce categorized changelog with breaking changes, features, fixes, and contributor attribution.
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
handoff
Export a Waybill Bundle by default, or import one when requested.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.