Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amritWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/performance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/performance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/performance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00929 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00464 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
performance scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
grep -rn "readFileSync\|writeFileSync\|execSync" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" . | grep -v node_modules | head -10 How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/performance — Performance Analysis & Optimization
Profile application performance, identify bottlenecks, and implement optimizations with before/after benchmarks.
Instructions
Step 1: Define Performance Scope
From $ARGUMENTS:
- Build performance — Compilation, bundling speed
- Runtime performance — API response times, rendering speed
- Database performance — Query execution, indexing
- Memory performance — Leaks, allocation patterns
- Bundle size — JavaScript/CSS output size
Step 2: Baseline Measurement
ALWAYS measure BEFORE optimizing:
# Build metrics
time npm run build 2>&1
# Bundle analysis (if applicable)
npx next build --profile 2>&1 || npx vite build --report 2>&1
# Bundle size
find dist -name "*.js" -exec wc -c {} + 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -10
# Runtime profiling (Node.js)
node --prof [entry-point] 2>/dev/null
# Database queries (if applicable)
# Check for slow queries in logs
Record baseline:
## Baseline Measurements
| Metric | Value | Target |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Build time | [Xs] | [Xs] |
| Bundle size | [XKB] | [XKB] |
| API response (p50) | [Xms] | [Xms] |
| API response (p99) | [Xms] | [Xms] |
| Memory usage | [XMB] | [XMB] |
Step 3: Identify Bottlenecks
Analyze for common performance issues:
# Large files (potential bundle bloat)
find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" | xargs wc -l | sort -rn | head -20
# Heavy imports
grep -rn "import.*from" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" . | grep -v node_modules | sort -t: -k3 | head -30
# N+1 query patterns
grep -rn "await.*find\|await.*query\|\.map.*async" --include="*.ts" . | grep -v node_modules | head -20
# Missing indexes (check schema)
grep -rn "where\|WHERE\|findBy\|findOne" --include="*.ts" --include="*.sql" . | grep -v node_modules | head -20
# Synchronous operations in async context
grep -rn "readFileSync\|writeFileSync\|execSync" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" . | grep -v node_modules | head -10
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 127 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 1b4c31b80551
performance is a command published in the GitHub repository boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 929 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.