Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amritWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01232 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00246 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/plan — Create Implementation Plan
Create a plan that is an executable prompt — so clear that a different agent could execute it and produce identical results. Uses the
writing-plansskill.
Usage
/plan [feature-or-phase] — Plan a specific feature or phase
/plan --from-discuss — Plan using locked decisions from /discuss
Prerequisites
.planning/exists (run/init-projectfirst)- Ideally,
/discusswas run to lock decisions (recommended, not required) - If
research_before_planningis enabled in config,/researchhas been run
Instructions
Step 1: Load Context
# Load current state
node planning-tools.cjs state load
Read:
.planning/PROJECT.md— understand the project.planning/ROADMAP.md— understand the phase.planning/STATE.md— understand current position- Discussion context (if exists):
.planning/research/[feature]-context.mdor.planning/phases/[NN]-[name]/CONTEXT.md - Existing codebase patterns
Step 2: Respect Locked Decisions
If a CONTEXT.md exists with locked decisions, these are non-negotiable constraints:
## Locked Decisions (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
- [Decision 1] — MUST implement exactly this way
- [Decision 2] — Do NOT substitute
If no CONTEXT.md exists, recommend running /discuss first:
"No locked decisions found. Run /discuss [feature] to capture preferences first?
Or proceed with planning using my best judgment?"
Step 3: Research Codebase
Understand the codebase before planning:
# Check existing patterns
grep -r "pattern-to-find" src/ --include="*.ts" -l
# Understand the test setup
ls tests/ test/ __tests__/ spec/ 2>/dev/null
# Check dependencies
cat package.json | grep -A 50 '"dependencies"' 2>/dev/null
Step 4: Design Solution
Make architecture decisions:
### Decision: [Title]
- **Options:** [A vs B vs C]
- **Chosen:** [X]
- **Rationale:** [Why]
- **Trade-offs:** [What we give up]
Record decisions:
node planning-tools.cjs state add-decision "[decision]" --rationale "[why]"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 186 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 24462ab6956d
plan is a command published in the GitHub repository boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,232 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.