Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BoxLogoDev/sapstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/boxlogodev/sapstack/sap-abap-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boxlogodev/sapstack/sap-abap-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boxlogodev/sapstack/sap-abap-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boxlogodev/sapstack/sap-abap-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boxlogodev/sapstack/sap-abap-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00560 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00224 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
sap-abap-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
ABAP 코드 리뷰
대상: $ARGUMENTS
실행 순서
-
파일 탐색
- 인수가 경로면 Read로 로드
- 인수가 객체명이면 Glob으로 검색 (
**/*$ARGUMENTS*.abap,**/Z$ARGUMENTS*) - 여러 파일 매칭 시 사용자 확인
-
컨텍스트 수집
- 관련 파일의 import/include 추적
- DDIC 의존성 확인 (TABLES, TYPE, STRUCTURE)
-
sap-abap-developer 서브에이전트에 위임
- Task 도구로
sap-abap-developer호출 - 코드 전문 전달
- 한국 현장 맥락(K-SOX, 개인정보보호법) 포함 요청
- Task 도구로
-
결과 통합
- Critical 이슈는 즉시 표시
- Warning은 우선순위 정렬
- Good 항목도 인정
리뷰 범위
- Clean Core 준수
- HANA 성능 (SELECT, JOIN, FOR ALL ENTRIES)
- S/4HANA 대응 (BP, ACDOCA, MATDOC)
- ATC Priority 검증
- 보안 (AUTHORITY-CHECK)
- 한국 개인정보보호법 (민감정보 로그/출력)
출력 예시
## 📋 리뷰 대상
- 파일: Z_CUSTOM_REPORT.abap (324 라인)
- 관련: Z_CUSTOM_UTIL (include)
## 🔴 Critical (N건)
1. [Z_CUSTOM_REPORT:45] SELECT * FROM BSEG — S/4에서 ACDOCA로 변경 필요
## 🟡 Warning (N건)
1. [Z_CUSTOM_REPORT:120] FOR ALL ENTRIES에 empty check 누락
## 🟢 Good
- AUTHORITY-CHECK 패턴 올바름
## 📊 ATC 예상
- P1: N / P2: N / P3: N
참조
agents/sap-abap-developer.mdplugins/sap-abap/skills/sap-abap/references/clean-core-patterns.mdplugins/sap-abap/skills/sap-abap/references/code-review-checklist.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A c37d4fee0bf0
sap-abap-review is a command published in the GitHub repository BoxLogoDev/sapstack (20 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 560 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
widget-lint
Analyzes SAC custom widget code for performance issues, security concerns, and best practice violations.
abap-cloud-review
Review ABAP code for ABAP Cloud readiness, released API usage, syntax constraints, and upgrade-safe remediation steps.
api-style-review
Review SAP API style compliance for REST, OData, OpenAPI, SDK naming, documentation, and lifecycle readiness.
btp-architecture-review
Review SAP BTP architecture decisions for account model, services, security, integration, operations, and rollout readiness.
abap-cds-model-check
Analyze ABAP CDS views for modeling correctness, annotations, performance, authorization, and activation risks.
sap-review
Trigger a structured SAP code review — invoked when ABAP, CDS, RAP, BTP, or integration code needs to be reviewed for quality, performance, security, and clean core compliance.