Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/bradlay/claude-code-recipes/plan-review-backendgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bradlay/claude-code-recipesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bradlay/claude-code-recipes/plan-review-backend)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bradlay/claude-code-recipes/plan-review-backend"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bradlay/claude-code-recipes/plan-review-backend.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00673 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00336 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
plan-review-backend scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/plan-review-loop:plan-review-backend
Pick the plan-review backend for this session. The choice is sticky: every
ExitPlanMode reviews against it until you change it or the session ends.
The user invoked this command with: $ARGUMENTS
What to do
-
FIRST, check whether a backend is already pinned for this session:
printenv CLAUDE_PLAN_REVIEW_CHAINIf that prints a non-empty value, the review backend is PINNED and there is nothing to choose. This is the case in an
autosre claude(local) session, which pinslocalso reviews stay 100% on the local qwen. Tell the user the backend is pinned to that value and STOP — do NOT probe, do NOT show a picker. The picker is only for sessions where no chain is pinned (e.g. bare cloudclaude). -
If
$ARGUMENTScontainsclear, run:CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}" "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/plan-review-select" --latest-session --clearThen tell the user the next
ExitPlanModewill ask again, and stop. -
Otherwise, find which backends are verified working right now:
CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}" "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/plan-review-probe" --online --jsonOnly offer backend keys whose probe result is
ok(one of:opus,sonnet,codex,gemini). If none pass, report that and stop. -
Use AskUserQuestion to ask which backend to use, one option per verified key (label them: Opus 4.8 / Sonnet 5 / codex gpt-5.6-sol / Gemini 3.1 Pro).
-
Persist the choice (replace
<key>with the chosen key):CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}" "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/plan-review-select" --latest-session --reprobe <key>--reprobeconfirms the backend is reachable before saving. Report the result to the user.
Notes
- This is the same selection the
ExitPlanModehook prompts for; running it ahead of time means the hook won't interrupt your first plan exit. - Under autoswe runs the backend is always the local qwen and is not asked.
- For a permanent non-interactive default, set
CLAUDE_PLAN_REVIEW_CHAIN=<key>orCLAUDE_PLAN_REVIEW_AUTOSELECT=<key>in your environment.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 66 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 9286cf53c37f
plan-review-backend is a command published in the GitHub repository bradlay/claude-code-recipes (2 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 673 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.