Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance/pitch-bookgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-financeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance/pitch-book)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance/pitch-book"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance/pitch-book.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.01231 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00246 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
pitch-book scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pitch-book — Create Pitch Book Sections
What This Command Does
Generates structured pitch book content following investment banking presentation standards. Creates clear, data-driven slides with executive summaries, market overviews, valuation analyses, transaction process timelines, and credentials sections. Output is structured for direct use in presentation software.
When to Use
- M&A sell-side or buy-side mandate pitches
- Strategic alternatives presentations to boards
- Capital raising presentations to investors
- Management presentations for due diligence
- Credentials decks for new client pitches
- Sector overview presentations
How It Works
- Structure Planning: Determines appropriate sections based on the pitch type and audience
- Content Generation: Creates each section with appropriate detail level — board audiences get strategic summaries, management gets operational detail
- Data Visualization Guidance: Suggests chart types and data layouts for each slide
- Narrative Flow: Ensures a logical storyline from situation overview through recommendation
- Formatting: Uses IB-standard formatting conventions — sources at bottom, disclaimers included, consistent terminology
Example Usage
Input:
/pitch-book topic:"Project Atlas — Strategic Alternatives" section:overview audience:board
Output:
# Project Atlas — Strategic Alternatives Review
## Presentation to the Board of Directors | Strictly Confidential
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## SLIDE 1: Situation Overview
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
**Key Messages:**
• Atlas operates in an attractive, consolidating market with 7.2% CAGR
• The company has reached an inflection point — scale required for next growth phase
• Three strategic paths available: organic growth, strategic partnership, or sale process
• Board mandate: evaluate all options and recommend optimal path by Q3 2026
**Suggested Visual:** 2×2 matrix — market attractiveness vs. competitive position
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## SLIDE 2: Executive Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
**Key Messages:**
• Revenue EUR 85M (2025A), EBITDA EUR 18.5M (21.8% margin)
• Market leader in DACH region (#1 share, 28%)
• Attractive financial profile: 85% recurring revenue, <5% churn, 115% NRR
• Preliminary indication of value: EUR 200M–260M (10.8x–14.1x EBITDA)
**Supporting Data Table:**
| Metric | 2023A | 2024A | 2025A | Comment |
|-------------------|-------|-------|-------|----------------------|
| Revenue (EUR M) | 62.0 | 73.5 | 85.0 | 17.1% CAGR |
| EBITDA (EUR M) | 11.8 | 15.2 | 18.5 | Margin expanding |
| FCF (EUR M) | 8.2 | 11.0 | 14.1 | Strong conversion |
| Net Debt (EUR M) | 12.0 | 8.5 | 4.2 | Deleveraging rapidly |
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## SLIDE 3: Strategic Alternatives Overview
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| Option | Pros | Cons | Timeline |
|----------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------|-----------|
| Status quo | Retain control, upside | Scale limitations | Ongoing |
| Strategic partner | Synergies, partial exit | Complexity, governance | 6–9 months|
| Full sale process | Maximum value, clean exit | Loss of control | 4–6 months|
| IPO | Retain upside, liquidity | Market risk, cost | 9–12 months|
**Recommendation:** Run a targeted dual-track process (strategic sale + select
financial sponsors) to maximize competitive tension and optionality.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## SLIDE 4: Preliminary Valuation Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
**Suggested Visual:** Football field chart showing valuation ranges by method
| Methodology | Low (EUR M) | Mid (EUR M) | High (EUR M) |
|---------------------|-------------|-------------|--------------|
| DCF (WACC 8–10%) | 195 | 230 | 270 |
| Trading Comps | 185 | 215 | 250 |
| Precedent M&A | 210 | 245 | 285 |
| **Blended Range** | **200** | **230** | **260** |
Note: Excludes potential synergy value to strategic acquirers (estimated
EUR 20M–40M incremental).
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## Disclaimer
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
This document is confidential and has been prepared solely for discussion
purposes. It does not constitute a recommendation or offer. All projections
are based on management estimates and publicly available information.
Source: Company management, annual reports, Capital IQ, Mergermarket
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 126 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A c3d6a58c351c
pitch-book is a command published in the GitHub repository brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 1,231 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
valuation-methods
Valuation methods analysis — multiples, DCF inputs, PEG integration, valuation assumption extraction.
merit-reconcile
Preview or check the status of Stripe → Merit payout reconciliation (read-only).
audit-checklist
Perform an internal audit, review controls, or prepare for an external financial audit.
scan
Scan AWS account for cost optimization.
finops-status
Orientation — say where an opportunity or assignment sits in the five-step FinOps lifecycle and what unlocks next. Useful when a record has no active stage: an opportunity while its assignments do the work, an assignment whose plan has not been approved yet, or a rejected or archived assignment. Read-only; mutates…
archive-ledger
../../../shared/commands/archive-ledger.md.