Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs/main/.claude/commands/review-task.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs/review-task)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs/review-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs/review-task/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs/review-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs/review-task.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01469 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00588 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00294 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00147 |
Grade A, and why
review-task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Task — Verify a completed task against its spec and acceptance criteria.
Variables
$ARGUMENTS — path to the task spec, with an optional task number suffix (same format as /implement).
Examples:
planning/phase0-blockC/tasks.md— review all tasks in the specplanning/phase0-blockC/tasks.md 1— review only Task 1planning/phase0-blockC/tasks.md 3— review only Task 3
Instructions
-
If
$ARGUMENTSis not provided, stop and ask the user for the task spec path. -
Parse
$ARGUMENTS: split on the last space. If the trailing token is a number, treat it as the task number to review; the remainder is the task spec path. -
Run
/primeto orient to the codebase before reading any files. -
Derive the spec dir:
planning/phase0-blockC/tasks.md→planning/phase0-blockC/sdlc/. -
Read the task spec in full.
-
Read prior step history as context, from
sdlc/state.jsonandsdlc/worklog.md: a. Readsdlc/state.json'stasks["<N>"]entry, if present —summary,files_changed,validated. If absent, note it and continue from source alone. b. Readsdlc/worklog.md's## Task <N> — TEST ...section(s), if present, for the historical test result. Do NOT treat it as authoritative — a fresh test run is required in step 8. If absent, note that/testwas not run before this review; the fresh run below covers it. -
Read every file listed in
tasks["<N>"].files_changed(or, if absent, read the files most likely touched by the task based on the spec). Verify the actual content — do not trust the recorded summary alone. -
Run a fresh test suite as the authoritative verification. Do NOT rely on the historical test worklog entry — run the commands now and capture the results.
- Task-scoped: run the spec's Validation Commands section exactly as written.
- Full block: run the spec's complete Validation Commands block. If none exist, run the
project's checks from
planning/harness.json(validation.checks[]); if that is absent too, stop and ask the user for the validation commands. The checks markedgates: trueinplanning/harness.jsonare authoritative for the verdict (a typical project gates its test suite and build). Also enforce any project-specific gate written inCLAUDE.md. A failing gated check always prevents PASS, even if all acceptance criteria appear MET from reading the code.
-
Check every Acceptance Criterion in the spec against the actual code and fresh test output:
- For each criterion: state whether it is MET, PARTIAL, or NOT MET, and cite the evidence (file + line, test name, command output).
- A criterion is MET only when you can point to code or test output that directly satisfies it.
- Do not mark anything MET based solely on the recorded
summary— verify in source.
-
Record the verdict (see Record) and summarize to the user.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 96 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 44304aa57932
review-task is a command published in the GitHub repository bredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs (23 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,469 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-26.
review-task compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| review-taskbredmond1019/claude-sdk-rs | Command | 23 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| diff-reviewcoco-research/coco | Command | 785 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| review-branchdamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 115 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| refactorRchGrav/claudebox | Command | 1.2k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| spec-trace-requirementsrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |
| merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |
| initazrtydxb/procoder | Command | 211 | 11d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 16 | Claude Code |