Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ca-who-codes/ultimate.uiux.design.skills/make-creativegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ca-who-codes/ultimate.UIUX.design.skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ca-who-codes/ultimate.uiux.design.skills/make-creative)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ca-who-codes/ultimate.uiux.design.skills/make-creative"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ca-who-codes/ultimate.uiux.design.skills/make-creative.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00487 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
make-creative scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Design a creative: $ARGUMENTS
Route by asset type and follow the Design Pro loop:
- Orient & lock the canvas — read
knowledge/INDEX.md, thenknowledge/08-visual-composition/format-specs.mdto set exact dimensions, aspect, DPI, bleed, and color space (sRGB screen / CMYK + 3 mm bleed @300 DPI for print). Readcomposition.md. - Load the matching playbook:
- Poster / flyer / brochure / card / banner / event signage →
knowledge/11-print-and-events/print-posters.md - Social post / story / thumbnail / ad →
knowledge/10-social-creatives/social-posts.md - Email / newsletter →
knowledge/12-email-design/email.md - Plus
knowledge/08-visual-composition/imagery-and-icons.mdandbrand-systems.md.
- Poster / flyer / brochure / card / banner / event signage →
- Design — one focal point and one clear message + one CTA; hierarchy for the real viewing distance (poster reads across a room; thumbnail reads at 120px; email scans on mobile); apply the brand system (derive one from a given color/font if none exists); restraint pass (one accent, consistent grid, generous margins, no clip-art/gradient-soup).
- Produce — per
knowledge/13-production/production-and-tools.md: HTML→PNG for social, HTML→PDF (with@pagebleed) for print, MJML/table-HTML (CSS inlined) for email. Verify fonts, dimensions, color space, and resolution on the rendered file. - Self-review against
knowledge/05-quality/review-checklist.mdand the production checklist (and, for print, the screen-to-print gotchas table).
Apply sensible defaults for anything unspecified and state assumptions. Deliver the producible source/output plus the chosen specs, brand tokens, and production method.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 21 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 2f2e87ed2609
make-creative is a command published in the GitHub repository ca-who-codes/ultimate.UIUX.design.skills (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 487 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
anti-slop-designer
Use when a UI looks machine-made rather than decided. Violet gradients, glassmorphism everywhere, identical cards in a grid, untouched shadcn or Material defaults, emoji bullets, or copy stuffed with seamless and unlock.
design-enforce
Use when code has drifted off the design system. Raw hex values and pixel numbers written where a token already exists, one-off components, library defaults left untouched. Finds every bypass and fixes it.
design-grill
Use when a design keeps getting reinvented every session. Interviews you until you share one understanding, then writes the vocabulary and the binding decisions into the repo so they survive the next context window.
design-triage
Use when a dwic audit report is full of findings and there is no plan. Ranks them into an order someone can work through, then works through it.
audit
Run a full UI/UX design audit on the current project. Scores 12 dimensions and produces a markdown report with prioritized findings.
auth-implementation
Use when a project needs real working login and signup rather than advice. Wiring up Clerk or Supabase Auth, protecting routes, handling sessions. Writes actual code, not guidance.