Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ca-who-codes/ultimate.uiux.design.skills/make-deckgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ca-who-codes/ultimate.UIUX.design.skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ca-who-codes/ultimate.uiux.design.skills/make-deck)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ca-who-codes/ultimate.uiux.design.skills/make-deck"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ca-who-codes/ultimate.uiux.design.skills/make-deck.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00451 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00226 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
make-deck scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Design a presentation: $ARGUMENTS
Work the deck through the Design Pro loop:
- Orient — read
knowledge/INDEX.md,knowledge/01-principles/decision-framework.md, andknowledge/09-presentations/decks.md. Set the format fromknowledge/08-visual-composition/format-specs.md(default 16:9, 1920×1080; vertical only if it's a social/mobile deck). - Find the through-line — the single core message and the narrative arc. Pick the deck type (pitch/sales/conference/internal) and design accordingly (speaker-support = sparse & visual, not a leave-behind wall of text). Use the standard pitch sequence as a checklist when relevant.
- Design slide-by-slide — assertion-evidence titles (the takeaway as the title, not a label), one idea per slide, big readable type (title ~40–54pt, body ~24–32pt, min ~18pt), one accent color, consistent master/grid, generous margins, direct-labeled charts. Apply the brand system (
knowledge/08-visual-composition/brand-systems.md); derive one if none exists. - Produce — per
knowledge/13-production/production-and-tools.md: generate an editable.pptx, build HTML slides → PDF, or use a slides/Express/Canva path. Keep text as real editable text. State which method and why. - Self-review against
knowledge/05-quality/review-checklist.mdand the deck-mistakes table (no text walls, no tiny fonts, no label-titles, consistent everything).
Ask only if a blocking decision is missing (audience, length, brand). Otherwise apply sensible defaults and state assumptions. Deliver the deck plus a slide outline and the production method.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 17 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 17d5373d592c
make-deck is a command published in the GitHub repository ca-who-codes/ultimate.UIUX.design.skills (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 451 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
anti-slop-designer
Use when a UI looks machine-made rather than decided. Violet gradients, glassmorphism everywhere, identical cards in a grid, untouched shadcn or Material defaults, emoji bullets, or copy stuffed with seamless and unlock.
design-enforce
Use when code has drifted off the design system. Raw hex values and pixel numbers written where a token already exists, one-off components, library defaults left untouched. Finds every bypass and fixes it.
design-grill
Use when a design keeps getting reinvented every session. Interviews you until you share one understanding, then writes the vocabulary and the binding decisions into the repo so they survive the next context window.
design-triage
Use when a dwic audit report is full of findings and there is no plan. Ranks them into an order someone can work through, then works through it.
audit
Run a full UI/UX design audit on the current project. Scores 12 dimensions and produces a markdown report with prioritized findings.
auth-implementation
Use when a project needs real working login and signup rather than advice. Wiring up Clerk or Supabase Auth, protecting routes, handling sessions. Writes actual code, not guidance.