Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cacr92/WeReply. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cacr92/WeReply/main/.claude/commands/check.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cacr92/WeReplyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cacr92/wereply/check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cacr92/wereply/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cacr92/wereply/check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cacr92/wereply/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cacr92/wereply/check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00491 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00196 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/check - 代码质量和安全检查
用途
执行全面的代码质量和安全检查，包括 lint、类型检查、安全审计等。
执行步骤
1. Rust 后端检查
# Clippy 检查
cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D warnings
# 格式检查
cargo fmt -- --check
# 安全审计
cargo audit
# 类型检查
cargo check --all-targets
2. TypeScript 前端检查
# ESLint 检查
cd frontend && npm run lint
# TypeScript 类型检查
cd frontend && npm run type-check
# 格式检查
cd frontend && npm run format:check
3. 测试覆盖率检查
# Rust 测试覆盖率
cargo tarpaulin --out Html --output-dir coverage
# TypeScript 测试覆盖率
cd frontend && npm run test:coverage
4. 依赖检查
# Rust 依赖更新检查
cargo outdated
# TypeScript 依赖检查
cd frontend && npm outdated
输出报告
检查完成后，生成报告：
## 代码质量检查报告
### Rust 后端
- ✅ Clippy: 无警告
- ✅ 格式: 符合规范
- ✅ 安全审计: 无已知漏洞
- ✅ 类型检查: 通过
### TypeScript 前端
- ✅ ESLint: 无错误
- ✅ 类型检查: 通过
- ✅ 格式: 符合规范
### 测试覆盖率
- Rust: 85% (目标: 80%)
- TypeScript: 82% (目标: 80%)
### 依赖状态
- Rust: 3 个依赖可更新
- TypeScript: 5 个依赖可更新
## 建议
1. 更新过时的依赖
2. 继续保持测试覆盖率
何时使用
- 提交代码前
- Pull Request 前
- 定期代码质量检查
- CI/CD 流程中
相关 Skills
- code-review
- security-review
- testing-strategy
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ae882c53e19e
check is a command published in the GitHub repository cacr92/WeReply (9 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 491 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
auditar-cascading
Invoca cascading-failures-auditor — audita serviço para 5 triggers de cascade (sem timeout, retry sem jitter, sem circuit breaker, sem deadline, queue unbounded) e gera CASCADING-AUDIT.md.
react-native
Command "react-native" from getsentry/toolkit, covering xcode build step (react-native xcode) and important notes.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.