Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/cacr92/wereply/optimizegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cacr92/WeReplyWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00861 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
optimize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/optimize - 性能优化分析
用途
识别性能瓶颈并提供具体的优化建议。
分析步骤
1. Rust 后端性能分析
识别热点代码
# 使用 cargo-flamegraph 生成火焰图
cargo flamegraph --bin cacrfeedformula
# 使用 criterion 进行基准测试
cargo bench
检查点
- 是否有不必要的克隆?
- 是否可以使用并行计算(Rayon)?
- 是否可以添加缓存(Moka)?
- 数据库查询是否优化?
- 是否有 N+1 查询问题?
2. React 前端性能分析
使用 React DevTools Profiler
// 识别重渲染问题
// 检查是否需要:
// - React.memo
// - useCallback
// - useMemo
检查点
- 组件是否过度渲染?
- 是否需要虚拟滚动(大列表)?
- 是否需要代码分割(lazy loading)?
- 是否有内存泄漏?
3. 数据库性能分析
SQLite 优化
-- 检查查询计划
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN SELECT ...;
-- 检查索引使用
PRAGMA index_list('table_name');
-- 检查表统计信息
ANALYZE;
检查点
- 是否有缺失的索引?
- 是否有未使用的索引?
- 查询是否可以优化?
- 是否需要批量操作?
优化建议模板
## 性能优化建议
### 高优先级(立即修复)
1. **配方优化计算耗时过长**
- 问题:单次优化耗时 15 秒
- 原因:未使用缓存,重复计算
- 建议:添加 Moka 缓存,缓存原料数据
- 预期改进:耗时减少到 3 秒
2. **原料列表渲染卡顿**
- 问题:1000+ 原料渲染缓慢
- 原因:��使用虚拟滚动
- 建议:使用 react-window
- 预期改进:渲染时间从 2 秒降到 200ms
### 中优先级(计划修复)
1. **数据库查询慢**
- 问题:配方列表查询耗时 500ms
- 原因:缺少索引
- 建议:添加 species_code 索引
- 预期改进:查询时间降到 50ms
### 低优先级(可选优化)
1. **启动时间优化**
- 问题:应用启动耗时 3 秒
- 原因:启动时加载所有数据
- 建议:延迟加载非关键数据
- 预期改进:启动时间降到 1.5 秒
性能基准
目标指标
- 应用启动时间: < 2 秒
- 配方优化计算: < 5 秒
- 数据库查询: < 100ms
- UI 响应时间: < 100ms
- 大列表渲染: < 500ms
测量工具
- Rust: cargo-flamegraph, criterion
- React: React DevTools Profiler
- 数据库: EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
- 整体: Chrome DevTools Performance
何时使用
- 发现性能问题时
- 定期性能审查
- 重大功能上线前
- 用户反馈卡顿时
相关 Skills
- rust-optimization
- react-typescript-development
- sqlite-optimization
- performance-standards (规范文件)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 122 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2b4e3c484b54
optimize is a command published in the GitHub repository cacr92/WeReply (6 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 861 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.