Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cafitac/hermit-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cafitac/hermit-agent/main/.claude/commands/code-polish-hermit.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cafitac/hermit-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cafitac/hermit-agent/code-polish-hermit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cafitac/hermit-agent/code-polish-hermit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cafitac/hermit-agent/code-polish-hermit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cafitac/hermit-agent/code-polish-hermit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cafitac/hermit-agent/code-polish-hermit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01539 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
code-polish-hermit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/code-polish-hermit — state-machine polish loop
Unlike /code-polish, this variant is a distributed state machine.
Hermit runs its own review-and-apply loop until it is self-clean, and
Claude provides two independent review passes on top as a quality gate.
Claude's token spend is capped at ~2 review rounds.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS — PR number (required).
--strategy {aggressive|moderate|conservative}— delegation depth. If omitted, read from the model-strategy map in the checkpoint config (same mechanism as/feature-develop-hermit).
Prerequisites
- Hermit gateway + MCP server running.
- Valid PR branch / worktree resolved.
- Project's test runner works (Hermit will invoke it).
State machine
HERMIT_LOOP ← Hermit self-reviews and fixes until clean
↓
CC_REVIEW_1 ← Claude review pass 1
│ ↓ findings? ←─────┐
│ │
└── clean ──→ CC_REVIEW_2 ↑
│ │
↓ │
clean │
↓ │
DONE │
│
findings? ──→ HERMIT_LOOP (iteration+1)
The loop terminates when two Claude review passes back to back are clean, or the global iteration limit (5) is hit, or Hermit fails three times in a row.
Workflow
Step 1 — lock
mkdir -p .hermit
cat > .hermit/active-task.lock <<EOF
{
"task_id": "<filled-after-run_task>",
"started_at": "$(date -Iseconds)",
"skill": "code-polish-hermit",
"state": "HERMIT_LOOP",
"iteration": 0,
"pr": "$ARGUMENTS"
}
EOF
Step 2 — state HERMIT_LOOP (initial entry)
mcp__hermit__run_task(cwd=<worktree>, background=true, model=<--model or "">)
You are Hermit. Polish PR #<PR-number> to your own "first clean" state.
Loop (max 5 internal iterations):
1. Self-review the PR diff against the project's review criteria.
Output Pn findings.
2. If findings are empty → STOP and report `self_clean: true`.
3. Otherwise, apply every finding.
4. Re-run the review.
5. Repeat.
Rules:
- TDD: every code change updates or adds tests; confirm the test
runner passes before closing an iteration.
- Preserve existing behaviour — never silently drop validation,
error handling, or cleanup.
- Do NOT commit or push.
- Stay in scope: touch only files in this PR's diff (or the
refactoring targets listed in `.omc/plans/<branch>-patterns.md`
if it exists).
- Ambiguous fix direction → call ask_user_question.
Completion:
- self_clean: true, OR internal iteration limit reached.
- Return: final state, iterations used, files modified.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 197 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8c56155e157a
code-polish-hermit is a command published in the GitHub repository cafitac/hermit-agent (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,539 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
mach12:pr-review
Run a comprehensive PR review with independent reviewers and post the results as a structured comment.
verify-change
A command that starts a separate, non-interactive Claude session to inspect an autopilot repository’s current Git changes.
mach12:gh-pr-read
Read a GitHub pull request's title, body, and all top-level PR conversation comments; optionally locate an HTML-marker comment.
mach12:integrate-branch
Integrate a same-repository branch locally, review the combined result, and push when authorized.
wayfinder-review
You are a code review specialist. Identify genuine issues while filtering out false positives.
speckit.spex.submit
Push and create PR for team review, with optional watch mode for CI monitoring.