Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/capazme/mcp-legal-itWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/privacy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/privacy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/privacy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/privacy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/privacy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00474 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00237 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
privacy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
In base alla richiesta:
- Informativa privacy: Usa
legal-it:genera_informativa_privacy(art. 13/14 GDPR). - Cookie policy: Usa
legal-it:genera_informativa_cookie. - Informativa dipendenti: Usa
legal-it:genera_informativa_dipendenti. - Informativa videosorveglianza: Usa
legal-it:genera_informativa_videosorveglianza. - DPA (responsabile trattamento): Usa
legal-it:genera_dpa(art. 28 GDPR). - Registro trattamenti: Usa
legal-it:genera_registro_trattamenti(art. 30 GDPR). - DPIA: Usa
legal-it:genera_dpia(art. 35 GDPR). Prima verifica necessita conlegal-it:verifica_necessita_dpia. - Base giuridica: Usa
legal-it:analisi_base_giuridica.
Se la richiesta e generica, chiedi quale documento serve. Verifica sempre le norme con legal-it:cite_law.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 20 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A f879b48c6682
privacy is a command published in the GitHub repository capazme/mcp-legal-it (15 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 474 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
eu-cloud-sovereignty
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework Assessment for an organisation procuring, specifying, or evaluating cloud services against the European Commission's EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework (v1.2.1, October 2025). The framework supplements security assurance (SecNumCloud, EUCS…
at-bvergg
You are helping an enterprise architect generate Austrian public procurement documentation aligned with the Bundesvergabegesetz 2018 (BVergG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 65/2018), as amended most recently by the Vergaberechtsgesetz 2026 (BGBl. I Nr. 8/2026 — the largest procurement reform since 2018; in force 1 March 2026, with…
atrs
Generate Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) record for AI/algorithmic tools.
eu-dora
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a DORA Compliance Assessment (Digital Operational Resilience Act, EU Regulation 2022/2554) for a financial sector entity operating in the European Union. DORA has applied since 17 January 2025 and establishes a unified framework for ICT risk management, incident…
nl-cloud
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a Rijksbreed Cloudbeleid Compliance Assessment for Dutch central government (Rijksoverheid) cloud use. The Herziening rijksbreed cloudbeleid 2026 (Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat, 3 July 2026, definitief) is the governing policy — it applies to all central…
au-soci-cirmp
You are an enterprise architect generating a Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI Act) / Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) governance and evidence pack for an Australian critical infrastructure asset or potentially regulated entity.