Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/capazme/mcp-legal-itWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/verbale)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/verbale"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/verbale/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/verbale"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/capazme/mcp-legal-it/verbale.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00639 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00256 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
verbale scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Comando /verbale — la serie storica dei rifiuti
Chiama legal-it:verbale_mensile (con months: $ARGUMENTS se indicato) e
mostra prima il grafico della serie (il campo grafico: una barra per
mese, scala sul massimo della finestra, il mese corrente marcato) — è il
confronto fra i mesi, a colpo d'occhio. Poi la tabella: una riga per mese con
rifiuti, accettazioni, il delta col mese precedente e il tool/tabella che ha
guidato il mese.
Cosa leggere nella serie
- Il mese corrente: se
delta_mese_precedenteè positivo, il primo posto della classifica (top_tool,top_tabella) dice cosa è peggiorato — parti da lì, non dal backlog completo. - Il confronto col backlog: chiama anche
legal-it:backlog_riconciliazionee incrocia: una tabella con rifiuti osservati ma zerorifiutanostatici indica che la qualità dei dati è peggiorata dopo l'ultima verifica (o che qualcuno ha rimosso unaalternativa); una tabella in cima al backlog senza rifiuti osservati è rumore, non priorità. - Un mese a zero non è un buco: o il verbale è spento
(
disponibile: false— dillo esplicitamente e suggerisciLEGAL_REFUSAL_LEDGER=on), o il mese è andato davvero liscio.
Manutenzione senza aprire il codice
- Stessa aggregazione da terminale:
python3 scripts/verbale-report.py(--out report.mdper archiviarlo,--strictper far fallire una pipeline quando il mese è peggiorato). - Il verbale registra solo rifiuti e accettazioni di precisione — mai dati di causa. Nessun regime di riservatezza necessario.
- Dopo una riconciliazione (vedi
/dati), il mese successivo deve mostrare il calo: se non lo mostra, la riconciliazione non ha toccato i tool che bloccano davvero.
Nota
Il report legge <MCP_CACHE_DIR>/refusals.jsonl, lo stesso file che il
middleware scrive a ogni rifiuto/accettazione: tool e script non possono mai
disaccordarsi sui numeri.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago First seen · 47 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 150818171af9
verbale is a command published in the GitHub repository capazme/mcp-legal-it (24 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 639 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.
Other commands, from other repositories
check
View the latest screenshot from /Pictures/Screenshots.
gsd:discuss-phase
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning.
gsd:explore
Socratic ideation and idea routing — think through ideas before committing to plans.
eu-cloud-sovereignty
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework Assessment for an organisation procuring, specifying, or evaluating cloud services against the European Commission's EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework (v1.2.1, October 2025). The framework supplements security assurance (SecNumCloud, EUCS…
at-bvergg
You are helping an enterprise architect generate Austrian public procurement documentation aligned with the Bundesvergabegesetz 2018 (BVergG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 65/2018), as amended most recently by the Vergaberechtsgesetz 2026 (BGBl. I Nr. 8/2026 — the largest procurement reform since 2018; in force 1 March 2026, with…
atrs
Generate Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) record for AI/algorithmic tools.