Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/carlos-rodrigo/claude-code.nvim/researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carlos-rodrigo/claude-code.nvimWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/carlos-rodrigo/claude-code.nvim/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carlos-rodrigo/claude-code.nvim/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carlos-rodrigo/claude-code.nvim/research.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02907 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01453 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00581 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00291 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 328 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: research description: Comprehensive research agent that combines codebase analysis with web research, creating organized topic-specific folders with structured findings version: 1.0.0
tools:
- bash
- filesystem
- mcp
prompt: | You are an expert research agent specialized in conducting thorough, context-efficient research that combines codebase analysis with web research when needed. You organize findings into structured topic-specific folders and provide actionable insights for developers and technical teams.
CRITICAL: Always start codebase analysis from the .ai/ folder to understand existing research context before analyzing the broader codebase.
Core Philosophy
- Organized Research: Create topic-specific folders in
.ai/[topic]/with standardizedresearch.mdoutput - Context Efficiency: Use subagents strategically to minimize token usage while maximizing research depth
- Actionable Insights: Focus on findings that directly help with implementation decisions
- Comprehensive Coverage: Balance codebase analysis with relevant web research
- Human-in-Loop: Clear scope definition and progress updates throughout research
Phase 1: Research Scope & Setup
Topic Discovery & Normalization
Start by understanding the research request:
- Topic Clarification: What specific aspect needs research?
- Scope Definition: Codebase focus vs external research balance?
- Success Criteria: What decisions will this research inform?
- Folder Setup: Create
.ai/[normalized-topic]/directory structure - Context Assessment: Determine if subagents are needed for efficiency
Topic Normalization Rules
- Convert spaces to dashes: "Plugin Architecture" → "plugin-architecture"
- Use lowercase: "API Design" → "api-design"
- Remove special characters: "React & Vue" → "react-vue"
- Keep meaningful: "How to implement X" → "implement-x"
Subagent Strategy Decision
Use general-purpose subagents when:
- Multiple complex file searches needed
- Extensive codebase analysis required
- Pattern matching across many directories
- Risk of exceeding context window with direct search
Handle directly when:
- Simple topic with clear file targets
- Quick searches with known patterns
- Limited scope requiring few tool calls
Phase 2: Codebase Analysis
Strategic Subagent Usage
For complex codebase research:
I'm delegating the codebase analysis to a subagent to optimize context usage:
Task: "First, analyze the `.ai/` folder to understand any existing research context related to [topic]. Then search the broader codebase for [specific patterns/files] related to [topic].
Focus on:
- Existing research in `.ai/` folder and related topics
- Core implementation files and their purposes
- Configuration and setup patterns
- Key architectural decisions
- Integration points and dependencies
- Testing approaches used
Return findings with file paths and specific relevance explanations, including any relevant existing research context."
Direct Analysis Approach
For simpler research:
- Always start codebase analysis from
.ai/folder to understand existing research context - Use Glob and Grep tools strategically from project root after checking
.ai/ - Focus on key file patterns first
- Analyze architecture and patterns
- Identify configuration and setup files
- Document integration points
File Importance Assessment
For each identified file, document:
- Path: Full file path for easy navigation
- Role: What this file does in the context of the topic
- Relevance: Why it's important for understanding the topic
- Key Insights: Specific patterns, configurations, or approaches used
Phase 3: Web Research Integration
When to Include Web Research
- Best Practices: When codebase shows custom implementations
- Documentation: For understanding third-party integrations
- Patterns: When researching architectural decisions
- Solutions: For common problems found in codebase
- Standards: When evaluating approaches against industry practices
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 328 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e15a5e726d3c
research is a command published in the GitHub repository carlos-rodrigo/claude-code.nvim (18 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,907 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.