Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carloshpdoc/ios-workflow-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/carloshpdoc/ios-workflow-claude/open-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carloshpdoc/ios-workflow-claude/open-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carloshpdoc/ios-workflow-claude/open-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carloshpdoc/ios-workflow-claude/open-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carloshpdoc/ios-workflow-claude/open-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02624 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01050 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00525 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00262 |
Grade A, and why
open-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 238 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Pull Request
Project context: Values in angle brackets below (e.g.
<scheme>,<JIRA_KEY>,<flag-key-enum>) are resolved at runtime — detect them from the project (xcodebuild -list -jsonfor the scheme,git/ghfor repo & owner, the branch name for the Jira key, a codebase search for flag/font files), or ask if they cannot be inferred. This plugin ships no per-project config.
Create a pull request for the current branch following the the team's standard PR template.
$ARGUMENTS (optional): space-separated options. All are optional and can be combined in any order.
| Argument | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
--base <branch> |
Base branch for the PR | dev |
--draft |
Create as draft PR | off |
--reviewer <user> |
Add reviewer(s). Can repeat: --reviewer user1 --reviewer user2 |
none |
--label <name> |
Add label(s). Can repeat: --label bug --label urgent |
none |
For convenience, a bare value (no -- prefix) is treated as --base <value>.
Examples:
/open-pr- PR todev/open-pr main- PR tomain(shorthand for--base main)/open-pr --base feature/<JIRA_KEY>-XXXX-some-feature- PR to another feature branch/open-pr --draft- Draft PR todev/open-pr --base feature/<JIRA_KEY>-XXXX --draft --reviewer jvlcapi- Draft PR to a feature branch with reviewer/open-pr --label bug --reviewer jvlcapi --reviewer other-dev- PR todevwith label and two reviewers
Steps
1. Parse Arguments
Parse $ARGUMENTS to extract:
- --base : the target base branch, or
devif not provided. A bare value (no--prefix) is also treated as the base branch for convenience (e.g.,mainis equivalent to--base main) - --draft: if present, add
--draftflag togh pr create - --reviewer : collect all
--reviewervalues, add each as--reviewer <user>togh pr create - --label : collect all
--labelvalues, add each as--label <name>togh pr create
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 238 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 614741c472b8
open-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository carloshpdoc/ios-workflow-claude (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,624 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
ia-document-release
Post-ship documentation sync. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, and optionally bumps the version.
ia-review
Perform exhaustive code reviews using multi-agent analysis, ultra-thinking, and worktrees.
prune-sync-log
Prune stale entries from the whetstone sync decision log.
ia-changelog
Create engaging changelogs for recent merges to main branch.
release
Bump version, commit, push, mirror to ai-skills, and update local plugin.
repo-audit
Read-only quality audit summary via repoindex ops audit. Shows failing checks by severity without fixing anything.