Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/main/.claude/commands/review-ready.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00523 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
review-ready scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review-ready — Mark current work as ready for review
The current feature branch work is complete. Prepare it for review.
Steps
-
Detect the current branch and issue number:
BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)Extract the issue number from the branch name (pattern:
issue-<NUMBER>-*). -
Run tests and lint to make sure everything passes:
# Adjust these to the project's actual commands npm test 2>&1 || true npm run lint 2>&1 || trueIf tests fail, fix them before proceeding. If lint has auto-fixable issues, fix and commit.
-
Commit any remaining changes with a descriptive message referencing the issue:
git add -A git commit -m "feat: <summary> (#<NUMBER>)" -
Push the branch:
git push -u origin $BRANCH -
Create a pull request:
gh pr create \ --title "<Issue title>" \ --body "Closes #<NUMBER> ## Changes <brief summary of what was implemented> ## Testing <what was tested and how>" \ --base main \ --head $BRANCH -
Move the issue to Review:
./scripts/gh-project.sh move <NUMBER> "Review" -
Update the issue description — change status to Review and add completion notes:
# Append to the Implementation Progress section gh issue edit <NUMBER> --body "$(gh issue view <NUMBER> --json body -q .body | sed 's/Status: \*\*In Progress\*\*/Status: **Review**/') - ✅ Completed: $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ) - PR: <PR_URL> " -
Inform me with a summary: what was done, the PR link, and any notes for the reviewer.
Rules
- Always create a PR — never push directly to main.
- The PR body must reference
Closes #<NUMBER>so GitHub auto-links the issue. - If tests are failing and you cannot fix them, tell me instead of creating the PR.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 68 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A acfdf68f29ff
review-ready is a command published in the GitHub repository carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 523 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-diff
Review the current working diff for correctness, security, and reuse.
elegant-code-review
Review the current working diff against the elegant-code decision ladder and propose deletions, honoring the negligence floor.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
prp-commit
Quick commit with natural language file targeting: describe what to commit in plain English.
fix-comments
Address PR review comments by implementing requested changes automatically.
validate-pr-description
Use when validating a PR title and description for conventional commit format, issue linking keywords, and template compliance before submission.