borsdata-mcp-server: Command for Claude Code

.claude/commands/review-ready.md

review-ready is a command for Claude Code from carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server. It costs 0 tokens per session (523 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that prepares completed work on the current feature branch for code review. It runs tests and linting, commits and pushes changes, opens a pull request, and updates the issue.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after finishing an issue to check the code, create a reviewable branch and pull request, and move the issue to Review.
Why use it?
It collects the usual review handoff steps in one workflow and links the branch, pull request, and project issue.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on borsdata-mcp-server itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything borsdata-mcp-server configures →

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is ./scripts/gh-project.sh move <NUMBER> "Review".

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/main/.claude/commands/review-ready.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-ready

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-ready

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server/review-ready.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 523 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00523
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00262
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00105
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00052

Measured 8d ago against content hash acfdf68f29ff, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-ready scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/review-ready.md · 68 lines

What it actually says

/review-ready — Mark current work as ready for review

The current feature branch work is complete. Prepare it for review.

Steps

  1. Detect the current branch and issue number:

    BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
    

    Extract the issue number from the branch name (pattern: issue-<NUMBER>-*).

  2. Run tests and lint to make sure everything passes:

    # Adjust these to the project's actual commands
    npm test 2>&1 || true
    npm run lint 2>&1 || true
    

    If tests fail, fix them before proceeding. If lint has auto-fixable issues, fix and commit.

  3. Commit any remaining changes with a descriptive message referencing the issue:

    git add -A
    git commit -m "feat: <summary> (#<NUMBER>)"
    
  4. Push the branch:

    git push -u origin $BRANCH
    
  5. Create a pull request:

    gh pr create \
      --title "<Issue title>" \
      --body "Closes #<NUMBER>
    
    ## Changes
    <brief summary of what was implemented>
    
    ## Testing
    <what was tested and how>" \
      --base main \
      --head $BRANCH
    
  6. Move the issue to Review:

    ./scripts/gh-project.sh move <NUMBER> "Review"
    
  7. Update the issue description — change status to Review and add completion notes:

    # Append to the Implementation Progress section
    gh issue edit <NUMBER> --body "$(gh issue view <NUMBER> --json body -q .body | sed 's/Status: \*\*In Progress\*\*/Status: **Review**/')
    
    - ✅ Completed: $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)
    - PR: <PR_URL>
    "
    
  8. Inform me with a summary: what was done, the PR link, and any notes for the reviewer.

Rules

  • Always create a PR — never push directly to main.
  • The PR body must reference Closes #<NUMBER> so GitHub auto-links the issue.
  • If tests are failing and you cannot fix them, tell me instead of creating the PR.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 68 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A acfdf68f29ff

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-ready is a command published in the GitHub repository carlwestman/borsdata-mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 523 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.