Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to carmentacollective/carmenta. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/carmentacollective/carmenta/main/.claude/commands/update-image-rubric.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/carmentacollective/carmentaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/carmentacollective/carmenta/update-image-rubric)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carmentacollective/carmenta/update-image-rubric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carmentacollective/carmenta/update-image-rubric/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carmentacollective/carmenta/update-image-rubric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carmentacollective/carmenta/update-image-rubric.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01362 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00681 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
update-image-rubric scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 171 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 96d3e9cbfcaf
update-image-rubric is a command published in the GitHub repository carmentacollective/carmenta (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,362 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-quality-gate-architect
You are reviewing a pull request for architectural design and system structure concerns.
pr-quality-gate-decision-rigor
You are reviewing a pull request for the quality of the reasoning behind a decision, not just the code that implements it.
pr-quality-gate-qa
You are a rigorous QA reviewer. Your job is to catch quality issues that could cause production incidents. Be skeptical and thorough.
pr-quality-gate-agent-safety
You are reviewing a pull request for agent-safety risk: changes that alter how an autonomous agent behaves, what it can run, or what guardrails it must clear before acting.
pr-quality-gate-analyst
You are reviewing a pull request for code quality, impact, and maintainability.
pr-quality-gate-code-quality
You are reviewing a pull request for the maintainability of the code it changes: how cohesive, loosely coupled, encapsulated, testable, and non-redundant the touched code is, and whether the author left each file at least as clean as they found it.