Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CarolaneLFBV/ios-development-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/carolanelfbv/ios-development-agents/analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00268 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00107 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/ios:analyze
Review $ARGUMENTS without changing source code. Inspect the requested files,
working diff or branch and relevant callers; ground findings in concrete behavior.
Work directly unless the user explicitly requests parallel specialists.
--focus performance|security|architecture|qualityselects the domain (default: quality).--reviewemphasizes regressions and actionable findings.--checklistincludes a short checklist specific to the reviewed code.--scoreincludes a clearly labeled subjective score with its rubric, not a measured quality gate.--prformats a review recommendation; it does not post or approve a PR.--instrumentsadds concrete profiling steps for performance hypotheses.--export <path>saves the report to that path.
Use the relevant specialist expertise. Check deployment/toolchain compatibility, isolation, error paths, state identity and security where relevant. Prioritize behavioral risks over stylistic preferences.
Report findings by severity with file/line, trigger, impact and suggested correction. State when there are no actionable findings and disclose validation gaps.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · -70 lines · +1 tokens per session 081d6c0714fd
- 1mo ago First seen · 96 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 1287134a8b10
analyze is a command published in the GitHub repository CarolaneLFBV/ios-development-agents (7 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 268 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
flutter-review
Review Flutter/Dart code for idiomatic patterns, widget best practices, state management, performance, accessibility, and security. Invokes the flutter-reviewer agent.
erne-code-review
ERNE — Comprehensive code review combining code quality and performance analysis.
mobile-review
Senior-level deep review of an existing mobile app. Reads targeted source files to analyze architecture, code quality, robustness, performance, and security. Produces a prioritized findings report.
android
Invoke the Native Mobile Developer for Android — Kotlin, Jetpack Compose, platform APIs, and Play delivery.
ios
Invoke the Native Mobile Developer for iOS — Swift, SwiftUI, UIKit, platform APIs, and App Store delivery.
swift-critique
Critique SwiftUI code for patterns, design, clean code, accessibility, and performance.