Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Caseous-kerrcell366/claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/en)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/en"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/en/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/en"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/en.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00005 | $0.00028 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00011 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00003 |
Grade A, and why
en scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Switch back to English. Respond in English from now on.
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A e8451b460d61
en is a command published in the GitHub repository Caseous-kerrcell366/claude (2 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 28 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
burn-rate
Compute the recent 7-day spend trend (burn rate) from daily sessions and per-session cost.
health
One-line reliability verdict (OK / DEGRADED / FAILING) for Claude Code usage.
replay
Summarize one Agent Monitor session by id — header plus a concise transcript recap.
focus-report
One-screen focus snapshot — avg turn duration, thinking-block usage, and longest sessions.
runs
List live and persisted CCAM-launched Claude Code and Codex runs.
memory-forget
Command "memory-forget" from waittim/MemoryCustodian, covering memory-forget and review the preview, then apply its plan id.