Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Caseous-kerrcell366/claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/review-zh)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/review-zh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/review-zh/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/review-zh"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/caseous-kerrcell366/claude/review-zh.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00010 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
review-zh scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
用中文对当前项目进行代码审查。检查：Bug、安全漏洞、性能、可读性。按严重程度排序，给出修复建议。
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 7 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A 2e6b38f8ae88
review-zh is a command published in the GitHub repository Caseous-kerrcell366/claude (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 48 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
fix-pr-comments
Systematically resolve Pull Request review comments using gh CLI to fetch comments and apply requested changes.
review
Review code for quality, bugs, and improvements.
analyze
Deep analysis of code against project standards.
fix-pr
Fetch and resolve unresolved PR comments.
review-code
Review ONLY changed files from git diff. Focus: DRY, SOLID, CLAUDE.md guidelines.
review-changes
Review uncommitted changes and suggest improvements.