Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-WorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00224 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00090 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
4-dimension code review for implementation quality.
Inputs
- Plan file (plan.json)
- Git diff or modified files list
- Test results (if available)
Dimensions
| Dimension | Critical Issues |
|---|---|
| Quality | Empty catch, any casts, @ts-ignore, console.log |
| Security | Hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, eval/exec, innerHTML |
| Architecture | Circular deps, imports >2 levels deep, files >500 lines |
| Requirements | Missing core functionality, incomplete acceptance criteria |
Review Process
- Gather modified files from executor's state (team_msg get_state)
- Read each modified file
- Score per dimension (0-100%)
- Classify issues by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
- Generate verdict (BLOCK/CONDITIONAL/APPROVE)
Output
Write review report to /artifacts/review-report.md:
- Per-dimension scores
- Issue list with file:line references
- Verdict with justification
- Recommendations (if CONDITIONAL)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b0a2c0e2dd85
review-code is a command published in the GitHub repository catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow (2,120 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 224 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
cross-review
Run GitHub Copilot CLI and OpenAI Codex against the current git diff for cross-model review.
review
Structured code review with severity categorization (distinct from Claude Code's PR review).
code-simplify
Simplify code incrementally while preserving behavior exactly.
architecture-scenario-explorer
Explore architectural decisions through systematic scenario analysis with trade-off evaluation and future-proofing assessment.
hotfix-deploy
Command "hotfix-deploy" from qdhenry/Claude-Command-Suite, covering hotfix deploy command, instructions, emergency contact information, escalation timeline thresholds and 15 minutes: escalate to senior engineer.
cleanup-vibes
Transform a vibecoded project into a properly structured, deployment-ready codebase with secrets extracted and organized folders.