Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-WorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/review-code.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00224 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
4-dimension code review for implementation quality.
Inputs
- Plan file (plan.json)
- Git diff or modified files list
- Test results (if available)
Dimensions
| Dimension | Critical Issues |
|---|---|
| Quality | Empty catch, any casts, @ts-ignore, console.log |
| Security | Hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, eval/exec, innerHTML |
| Architecture | Circular deps, imports >2 levels deep, files >500 lines |
| Requirements | Missing core functionality, incomplete acceptance criteria |
Review Process
- Gather modified files from executor's state (team_msg get_state)
- Read each modified file
- Score per dimension (0-100%)
- Classify issues by severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
- Generate verdict (BLOCK/CONDITIONAL/APPROVE)
Output
Write review report to /artifacts/review-report.md:
- Per-dimension scores
- Issue list with file:line references
- Verdict with justification
- Recommendations (if CONDITIONAL)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 35 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b0a2c0e2dd85
review-code is a command published in the GitHub repository catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow (2,131 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 224 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
cross-review
Run GitHub Copilot CLI and OpenAI Codex against the current git diff for cross-model review.
is-not-duplicated
please investigate the codebase based on your changes - do we have code duplication? After analysis, write updates to DUPLICATIONREPORT.md with the results. Keep in mind that other agents could keep their records, so you need to check the document first, decided to update or add new information.
review
Structured code review with severity categorization (distinct from Claude Code's PR review).
bmad-build
Turns a work item — feature, story, bug fix, change request — into working code, reviewed and verified. Use when the user hands over an outcome and leaves the edits to you; a bare story or issue link counts. Also use whenever the user asks BMAD by name — then any change qualifies, even a tiny fully-specified edit. Do…
code-simplify
Simplify code incrementally while preserving behavior exactly.
kotlin-review
Comprehensive Kotlin code review for idiomatic patterns, null safety, coroutine safety, and security. Invokes the kotlin-reviewer agent.